Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39420184›Full record

ReviewProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2025

Navigating therapeutic sequencing in the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patient journey.

Hannah D McManus, Tanya Dorff, Alicia K Morgans, Oliver Sartor, Neal Shore, Andrew J Armstrong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Efficacy and outcomes of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  2. Evaluation of [The Prostate · 2026
    Observational
  3. Treatment patterns in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who received darolutamide in the ARAMIS trial in Spain: PARASEC study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hannah D McManusDuke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancer, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Tanya DorffCity of Hope National Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5990-298X
Alicia K MorgansDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6563-4587
Oliver SartorMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Neal ShoreCarolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, USA.
Andrew J ArmstrongDuke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancer, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. andrew.armstrong@duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7012-1754

Funding

Clinical genomic predictive model of first line androgen receptor inhibitor therapy outcomes in men with mCRPCR01CA256157 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ARMSTRONG, ANDREW J, DEHM, SCOTT M. · 2020 to 2025
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA256157Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (NPC) N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNovel therapies for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have improved patient outcomes. However, there is uncertainty on the optimal selection of therapeutic agents for subsequent lines of therapy.

methodsWe conducted a comprehensive review of published evidence from pivotal clinical trials and recent guidelines for the treatment of mCRPC. We further identify gaps in knowledge and areas for future research.

resultsKey considerations to help guide treatment selection for patients with mCRPC include personal treatment history, individual clinical characteristics, symptoms, prognosis, availability of clinical trials, and other patient-specific factors. Genetic testing and prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted imaging are important tools to evaluate candidacy for newer therapeutic options such as poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, alone or in combination with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, and [

conclusionThis article provides an overview of the evolving treatment landscape of mCRPC, discussing guideline-recommended treatment options and data from key clinical trials, while highlighting ongoing trials that may impact the future treatment landscape. Recommendations for optimal treatment sequencing based on individual patient factors are provided.

Indexed as

Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantHumansMaleNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID39420184
PMCPMC12003708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.