ArticleScientific reports2024
Supervised machine learning of outbred mouse genotypes to predict hepatic immunological tolerance of individuals.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is essential to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying liver transplant tolerance and rejection. In cases of mouse liver transplantation between inbred strains, immunological rejection of the allograft is reduced with spontaneous apoptosis without immunosuppressive drugs, which differs from the actual clinical result. This may be because inbred strains are genetically homogeneous and less heterogeneous than others. We exploited outbred CD1 mice, which show highly heterogeneous genotypes among individuals, to search for biomarkers related to immune responses and to construct a model for predicting the outcome of liver allografting. Of the 36 mice examined, 18 died within 3 weeks after transplantation, while the others survived for more than 6 weeks. Whole-exome sequencing of the 36 donors revealed more than 9 million variants relative to the C57BL/6 J reference. We selected 6517 single-nucleotide and indel variants and performed machine learning to determine whether or not we could predict the prognosis of each genotype. Models were built by both deep learning with a one-dimensional convolutional neural network and linear classification and evaluated by leave-one-out cross-validation. Given that one short-lived mouse died early in an accident, the models perfectly predicted the outcome of all individuals, suggesting the importance of genotype collection. In addition, linear classification models provided a list of loci potentially responsible for these responses. The present methods as well as results is likely to be applicable to liver transplantation in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.