Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39420114›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2024

A roadmap towards standardized neuroimaging approaches for human thalamic nuclei.

Shailendra Segobin, Roy A M Haast, Vinod Jangir Kumar, Annalisa Lella, Anneke Alkemade, Meritxell Bach Cuadra, Emmanuel J Barbeau, Olivier Felician, Giulio Pergola, Anne-Lise Pitel and 3 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Thalamic nuclei insights into Alzheimer's disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shailendra SegobinNormandie University, UNICAEN, PSL Université Paris, EPHE, INSERM, U1077, CHU de Caen, Cyceron, Neuropsychologie et Imagerie de la Mémoire Humaine, Caen, France. segobin@cyceron.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1977-8210
Roy A M HaastAix-Marseille University, CRMBM CNRS UMR 7339, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8543-2467
Vinod Jangir KumarMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9691-017X
Annalisa LellaDepartment of Translational Biomedicine and Neuroscience (DiBraiN), University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Anneke AlkemadeIntegrative Model-based Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3234-353X
Meritxell Bach CuadraCIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2730-4285
Emmanuel J BarbeauCentre de recherche Cerveau et Cognition (Cerco), UMR5549, CNRS - Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0836-3538
Olivier FelicianAix Marseille Université, INSERM INS UMR 1106, APHM, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1481-1846
Giulio PergolaDepartment of Translational Biomedicine and Neuroscience (DiBraiN), University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9193-1841
Anne-Lise PitelNormandie University, UNICAEN, INSERM, U1237, PhIND "Physiopathology and Imaging of Neurological Disorders", NeuroPresage Team, Cyceron, Caen, France.
Manojkumar SaranathanDepartment of Radiology, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9020-9948
Thomas TourdiasNeuroimagerie diagnostique et thérapeutique, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7151-6325
Michael HornbergerNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. m.hornberger@uea.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2214-3788

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The thalamus has a key role in mediating cortical-subcortical interactions but is often neglected in neuroimaging studies, which mostly focus on changes in cortical structure and activity. One of the main reasons for the thalamus being overlooked is that the delineation of individual thalamic nuclei via neuroimaging remains controversial. Indeed, neuroimaging atlases vary substantially regarding which thalamic nuclei are included and how their delineations were established. Here, we review current and emerging methods for thalamic nuclei segmentation in neuroimaging data and consider the limitations of existing techniques in terms of their research and clinical applicability. We address these challenges by proposing a roadmap to improve thalamic nuclei segmentation in human neuroimaging and, in turn, harmonize research approaches and advance clinical applications. We believe that a collective effort is required to achieve this. We hope that this will ultimately lead to the thalamic nuclei being regarded as key brain regions in their own right and not (as often currently assumed) as simply a gateway between cortical and subcortical regions.

Indexed as

NeuroimagingThalamic NucleiBrain MappingHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.