ArticleScientific reports2024
Machine learning-based classification of valvular heart disease using cardiovascular risk factors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Unimodal to multimodal: a systematic review of predictive machine learning models for valvular heart diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Intelligent Decision Support for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Machine Learning Spans From Anatomical Assessment to Dynamic Risk Modeling.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Pre-trained Artificial Intelligence Models in the Prediction and Classification of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.The Eurasian journal of medicine · 2025Article
- Dementia and Heart Failure Classification Using Optimized Weighted Objective Distance and Blood Biomarker-Based Features.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Valvular Heart Disease (VHD) is a globally significant cause of mortality, particularly among aging populations. Despite advancements in percutaneous and surgical interventions, there are still uncertainties that remain regarding the risk factors that significantly contribute to this condition within the domain of cardiovascular disease. This study investigates these uncertainties and the role of machine learning in categorizing VHD based on cardiovascular risk factors. It follows a two-part investigation comprising feature extraction and classification phases. Feature extraction is initially performed using a wrapping approach and refined further with binary logistic regression. The second phase employs five classifiers: Artificial Neural Network (ANN), XGBoost, Random Forest (RF), Naïve Bayes, and Support Vector Machine (SVM), along with advanced methods such as SVM combined with Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and a majority-voting ensemble method (MV5). Data on VHD cases were collected from DHQ Hospital Faisalabad using simple random sampling. Various statistical measures, such as the ROC curve, F-measure, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, MCC, and Kappa are applied to assess the results. The findings reveal that the combination of SVM with PCA achieves the highest overall performance while the MV5 ensemble method also demonstrates high accuracy and balance in sensitivity and specificity. The variation in VHD prevalence linked to specific risk factors highlights the importance of a comprehensive approach to reduce this disease's burden. The Exceptional performance of SVM + PCA and MV5 highlights their significance in diagnosing VHD and advancing knowledge in biomedicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.