ArticleScientific reports2024
Transformer-based classification of visceral pain-related local field potential patterns in the brain.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuronal ensemble activity entrained by local field potential (LFP) patterns underlies a variety of brain functions, including emotion, cognition, and pain perception. Recent advances in machine learning approaches may enable more effective methods for analyzing LFP patterns across multiple brain areas than conventional time-frequency analysis. In this study, we tested the performance of two machine learning algorithms, AlexNet and the Transformer models, to classify LFP patterns in eight pain-related brain regions before and during acetic acid-induced visceral pain behaviors. Over short time windows lasting several seconds, applying AlexNet to LFP power datasets, but not to raw time-series LFP traces from multiple brain areas, successfully achieved superior classification performance compared with simple LFP power analysis. Furthermore, applying the Transformer directly to the raw LFP traces achieved significantly superior classification performance than AlexNet when using LFP power datasets. These results demonstrate the utility of the Transformer in the analysis of neurophysiological signals, and pave the way for its future applications in the decoding of more complex neuronal activity patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.