ReviewProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2025
Shaping the Future of Functional Foods: Using 3D Printing for the Encapsulation and Development of New Probiotic Foods.
Review in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Technological Innovation and Consumer Trust: Understanding Safety Perceptions in Next Generation Probiotic Development.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- 3D-Printable Chontaduro (Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Screening and Evaluation In Vitro ofMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Double-layer microencapsulation ofBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- In Vitro Assessment of Gut Microbiota Modulation Through Functional Biscuits Enriched with Almond By-Products.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Personalized Delivery of Probiotics and Prebiotics via 3D Food Printing.Metabolites · 2025Review
- Advancements in Microbial Applications for Sustainable Food Production.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Consumers have been demanding foods that, besides providing nutrition, bring some health benefits, known as functional foods. The insertion of probiotics in foods is a strategy for developing functional foods. Still, it has been a challenge because these matrices have different pHs and undergo different process temperatures and times that can reduce the viability of these microorganisms. In this sense, encapsulation using 3D printing emerges to protect probiotic microorganisms and ensure that they reach the intestine viable and carry out the expected beneficial action. Thus, this review evaluates the current advancements in 3D printing to encapsulate and develop novel probiotic foods. Research has shown that 3D printing effectively encapsulates probiotic microorganisms, preserving their viability throughout the gastrointestinal tract. Studies have proven the effectiveness of 3D printing encapsulation in protecting probiotics during processing, storage, and digestion. Innovative formulations for 3D bioprinted products with probiotics, such as food structures based on cereals, mashed potatoes, and cream, have been developed. Producing products with shelf life and combining applications of phytochemicals and probiotics aims to improve personalized nutrition, textural characteristics, and sensory attributes of the foods produced by this emerging approach. Therefore, 3D printing of foods with probiotics has the potential to create new products that meet this demand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39419915What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.