Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39419898›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2024

Improving equivalent scores for clinical neuropsychology: a new method for regression model selection.

Giorgio Arcara

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A novel writing to dictation test to investigate lexical and sublexical processes: Italian normative data and preliminary clinical feasibility in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's disease.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Normative data and clinical usability of the brief examination of social abilities: a novel screening test for social cognition.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  3. An updated italian normative data for a short version of the stroop colour word test.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Giorgio ArcaraIRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy. giorgio.arcara@hsancamillo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6270-6883

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Equivalent Scores (ES) represent a statistical gold standard to obtain thresholds for clinical inference from normative data. The procedure to obtain ES requires a preliminary mandatory step: to perform a regression model selection to obtain adjusted scores that take into account age, education, and sex. The current article, starting from theoretical considerations, focuses on this step and proposes a new and improved regression model selection method. Results from data simulation show that the newly proposed method outperforms the current one on a wide range of simulation parameters and conditions, leading to better performance in classifying impaired or unimpaired performances, and more precise ES. The article is associated with an online app and R code to allow to easily apply the method to other normative data. This new model selection procedure can be easily incorporated also with other regression-based norm approaches.

Indexed as

Neuropsychological TestsAdultAgedComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychologyRegression AnalysisEquivalent ScoresMethodologyNeuropsychological testsNormative dataRegression-based norms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.