SynthesisJournal of ultrasound2025
The association between integrating echocardiography use in the management of septic shock patients and outcomes in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of ultrasound, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Septic Cardiomyopathy: Age-Dependent Physiology and Hemodynamic Aspects-A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Transthoracic echocardiography and mortality in sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: An analysis based on MIMC-IV database.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Intraosseous versus intravenous fluid resuscitation in gastrointestinal tumor-related acute hemorrhage: impact on 30-day mortality and lactate clearance.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesSeptic shock in critically ill patients can increases morbidity and mortality. We aimed to study the effect on outcomes when integrating point of care (POC) echocardiography in the management of septic shock patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) who are being treated according to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines.
methodsAn electronic search of MEDLINE through PubMed, clinical trials.gov and google scholar was conducted for the period from January 1990-January 2024 to identify studies of septic shock adult and pediatric patients in the ICU managed according to SSC guidelines with or without POC echocardiography. Three reviewers extracted data independent of each other. Cochrane collaboration tool was used for bias assessment. Random effect meta-analysis used to pool data.
resultsA total of 1701 articles identified. Seven studies included in the final report with a total of 3885 patients. POC echocardiography guided septic shock management was associated with lower in-hospital and 28-day mortality (sOR = 0.82 [95%CI: 0.71-0.95], p = 0.01), more frequent initiation of inotropic support (sOR = 2.42 [95%CI 1.92-3.03], p < 0.0001) and shorter time to achieve lactate clearance (SMD = - 0.87 h [95%CI - 1.23 h to - 0.51 h], p < 0.0001). Summary estimates did not achieve significance for effect of POC echocardiography on 24-h fluid intake (SMD = - 2.11 ml [95%CI - 5.93 ml to 1.72 ml], p = 0.28) on mechanical ventilation-free days (SMD = 0.03 days [95%CI - 0.04 to 0.10], p = 0.94). Shock reversal time analysis was less meaningful due to the small number of studies reporting outcome.
conclusionsPOC echocardiography guided management in septic shock patients in the ICU can lead to a decrease in mortality, increase in initiation of inotropic support, and a decrease in lactate clearance time. Larger cohort studies and data collection and analysis are needed for further understanding and optimizing standardization of protocols for POC echocardiography use in septic shock patients in the ICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.