Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39419863›Full record

SynthesisEuropean radiology2025

Substituting with alternative iodinated contrast medium to prevent recurrent adverse drug reactions associated with its use: a meta-analysis.

Su Jin Lim, Pae Sun Suh, Chong Hyun Suh, Pyeong Hwa Kim, Kye Jin Park, Hyo Jung Park, Choong Wook Lee

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Su Jin Lim *Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Pae Sun Suh *Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chong Hyun SuhDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea. chonghyunsuh@amc.seoul.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4737-0530
Pyeong Hwa KimDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kye Jin ParkDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyo Jung ParkDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Choong Wook LeeDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo systematically review and meta-analyze the recurrent rate of iodinated contrast medium (ICM)-associated adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and the preventive effect of using alternative ICM lacking a common carbamoyl side chain. MATERIALS AND

methodsA systematic literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to identify studies that investigated the recurrence rate of ICM-associated ADRs or hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). Studies that included patients who subsequently underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans after their index reactions were included, while studies with overlapping cohorts were excluded. The first search was conducted on November 10, 2023. The pooled recurrence rate of ICM-associated ADR was determined using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were also conducted based on the substitution of ICM, with particular consideration given to the N-(2,3-dihydroxypropyl) carbamoyl side chain.

resultsA total of ten original articles were included in the analysis, collectively spanning from June 2001 to March 2021. The pooled recurrence rate of ICM-associated ADR was not significantly different from that of ICM-associated HSR (16.6% [95% CI, 7.8-31.9%] vs. 15.5% [95% CI, 10.8-21.8%], p = 0.87). In the subgroup analyses, the pooled odds ratio for ICM-associated recurrent ADR when using a different ICM compared with using the same ICM was 0.31 (95% CI, 0.21-0.45), which means a 69% reduction. Moreover, the pooled odds ratio for ICM-associated recurrent ADR when substituting ICMs with different side chains compared with substituting with common side chains was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.52-0.82), which means an additional 35% reduction.

conclusionSubstituting with an alternative ICM led to a 69% reduction in recurrent ADRs, with an additional 35% reduction observed when using ICM lacking a common carbamoyl side chain. KEY POINTS: Question No standardized guidelines exist for replacing previously used iodinated contrast medium (ICM) to prevent recurrent adverse reactions. Findings Using alternative contrast medium with a different carbamoyl side chain prevents adverse drug reactions effectively. Clinical relevance This study advocates using alternative ICM without a common carbamoyl side chain to prevent recurrent adverse drug reactions in patients with a history of such events.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaDrug HypersensitivityDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansRecurrenceContrast MediaContrast mediaDrug-related side effects and adverse reactionsHypersensitivityIodine compoundsTomography (X-ray computed)

Identifiers

PMID39419863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.