Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39419842›Full record

Trial reportGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025

Intravitreal methotrexate as an adjuvant in vitrectomy in cases of retinal detachment with proliferative vitreoretinopathy.

Renu P Rajan, K Naresh Babu, Karthik Kumar Arumugam, Sabareesh Muraleedharan, Obuli Ramachandran, Soumya Jena, Sakshi Kumar, Anubhav Upadhyay

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. A review of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: past, present and future.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Renu P RajanAravind eye hospital, Tamil Nadu, Madurai, India.
K Naresh BabuAravind eye hospital, Tamil Nadu, Madurai, India.
Karthik Kumar ArumugamAravind eye hospital, Tamil Nadu, Madurai, India.
Sabareesh MuraleedharanAravind eye hospital, Tamil Nadu, Madurai, India. sabareeshmd@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0798-0940
Obuli RamachandranAravind eye hospital, Tamil Nadu, Madurai, India.
Soumya JenaAravind eye hospital, Tamil Nadu, Madurai, India.
Sakshi KumarAravind eye hospital, Tamil Nadu, Madurai, India.
Anubhav UpadhyayAravind eye hospital, Tamil Nadu, Madurai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the rate of re-detachment in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and Grade-C PVR following vitreoretinal surgery, with and without serial intravitreal injections of methotrexate.

methodsIt was a randomized control trial. Patients aged more than 18 years undergoing pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with PVR grade C or more were included in the study. Patients treated with intravitreal injection of methotrexate were grouped as cases and those not injected served as controls. The cases received 3 intravitreal injections of methotrexate at monthly intervals. Patients were evaluated on Day 1, 1st month, 2nd month, 3rd month and 6th month in terms of BCVA, rate of re-attachment and grade of PVR.

resultsThe case group had 23 patients and the control group had 20 patients. 2 patients in the case group were lost to follow-up after the first follow-up, so they were excluded. So 21 patients in case group and 20 patients in control group were followed up. Six months after surgery, 15 'cases' had completely attached retina whereas 6 patients had partial detachment with macula on. There was no patient amongst the cases with macula-off retinal re-detachment. Out of 20 patients in the control group, 9 had a complete retinal attachment, 4 had partial detachment with macula-on and 7 had partial detachment with macula-off. There was statistically significant difference in macula off retinal detachment rates (p-value- 0.003).

conclusionSerial intravitreal methotrexate injections reduce the incidence of re-detachment in patients undergoing PPV for RRD with PVR-C. Further investigation into this promising therapeutic approach is warranted. KEY MESSAGES: What is known Methotrexate is an anti-inflammatory agent which is safe for intravitreal use There are case series retrospective and prospective studies suggesting potential benefit of intravitreal methotrexate in preventing re-detachment due to PVR What is new First randomized control trial studying the efficacy of intravitreal methotrexate in preventing re-detachment due to PVR Our study showed statistically significant difference in macula off retinal detachment between the 2 groups at 6 months of follow up.

Indexed as

MethotrexateRetinal DetachmentVisual AcuityVitrectomyVitreoretinopathy, ProliferativeAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsIntravitreal InjectionsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeImmunosuppressive AgentsMethotrexateIntravitreal injectionMethotrexateProliferative vitreoretinopathyRhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.