Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39419625›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

An expert consensus on the most effective components of integrated motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioural therapy for lifestyle behaviour change: protocol for an online modified Delphi study.

Stephen Barrett, Stephen Begg, Ashley Dunford, Paul O'Halloran, Kane Rodda, Emily Denniss, Jeff Breckon, Michael Kingsley

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Delphi Study to Identify Priority Indicators for Formulary Selection of Innovative Anticancer Drugs in China.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stephen BarrettHolsworth Research Initiative, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia s.barrett@latrobe.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2505-733X
Stephen BeggRural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
Ashley DunfordBendigo Health, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
Paul O'HalloranSchool of Psychology and Public Health La Trobe University Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kane RoddaOutpatient Rehabilitation, Bendigo Health Care Group, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
Emily DennissDeakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jeff BreckonTeesside University, Middlesbrough, North Yorkshire, UK.
Michael KingsleyHolsworth Research Initiative, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBehaviour change interventions are advocated as a key approach to manage behavioural risk factors such as insufficient physical activity, poor diet and smoking. Integrated motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioural therapy (MI-CBT) interventions have become increasingly popular to promote behaviour change; however, there is a lack of agreement as to what constitutes necessary components of MI-CBT interventions for lifestyle behaviour change. The primary objective of this study is to use a consensus method to develop guidelines to design and deliver MI-CBT interventions for lifestyle behaviour change.

methodsA three-round modified Delphi study will be conducted with an expert, international panel of clinicians and researchers. An online survey will be developed from assessments of key MI-CBT literature and practice guides to identify commonly used components of individually delivered MI and CBT interventions. In each round, participants will rate the extent to which they agree with each component using a Likert scale. Responses from Rounds 1 and 2 will be presented to participants in subsequent rounds. Responses will be represented using bar graphs and include the median and IQR of participants' responses. To encourage consensus, participants will be asked to consider the group responses before finalising their opinion to the statements. If at least 80% of the experts agree to a statement in Rounds 2 or 3, it will be included in a final list of necessary statements. DISCUSSION: This modified Delphi process will help transparency in the design and implementation of MI-CBT interventions. The consensus statement will also help reporting and comparability among effectiveness studies for MI-CBT intervention studies, and help inform research, policy and practice. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted by the La Trobe University Human Research Ethics Committee (approval number HEC24066). The results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, conferences and international professional associations.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyConsensusDelphi TechniqueMotivational InterviewingHumansLife StyleResearch DesignBehaviorPREVENTIVE MEDICINEPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID39419625
PMCPMC11487960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.