Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39419492›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of haematology2025

External validation and calibration of the HoLISTIC Consortium's advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma international prognostic index (A-HIPI) in the Brazilian Hodgkin lymphoma registry.

Valeria Buccheri, Frederico Rafael Moreira, Irene Biasoli, Nelson Castro, Carolina Colaço Villarim, Fabiola Traina, Talita Silveira, Monica Kopschitz Praxedes, Cristiana Solza, Leila Perobelli and 14 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Valeria BuccheriInstituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo/Hospital das Clinicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6999-4109
Frederico Rafael MoreiraLaboratório de Investigação Médica, Hospital das Clinicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Irene BiasoliSchool of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7265-7691
Nelson CastroHospital de Cancer de Barretos, Barretos, SP, Brazil.
Carolina Colaço VillarimLiga Norte Rio Grandense Contra o Câncer, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Fabiola TrainaFaculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4258-289X
Talita SilveiraSão Paulo Santa Casa Medical School, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Monica Kopschitz PraxedesUniversidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Cristiana SolzaUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4543-3630
Leila PerobelliHospital Brigadeiro, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0643-5975
Otavio BaiocchiUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Rafael GaiollaHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9480-4995
Carla BoquimpaniHemorio, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7396-2495
Caroline Bonamin SolaUniversidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Roberta Oliveira de Paulae SilvaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Ana Carolina RibasCEPON, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
Kátia PagnanoHospital Municipal de Paulinia, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7975-0805
Giovanna SteffenelloUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Carmino de SouzaHematology and Hemotherapy Center, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8656-8374
Nelson SpectorSchool of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2733-9835
Angie Mae RoddayInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8671-3401
Andrew M EvensDivision of Blood Disorders, Rutgers Cancer Institute, Boston, NJ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3320-0215
Susan K ParsonsInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0282-6490
HoLISTIC Consortium

Funding

Modeling Multi-Source Data in Hodgkin LymphomaR01CA262265 · NCI · TUFTS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Andrew M Evens, Susan Kenyon Parsons · 2022 to 2026
$3.6M
CNPq - Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnologico 440567/2014-9Division of Hematology, Hemotherapy and Cellular Therapy of Hospital das Clinicas - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP)Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E-26/102.977/2012NCI NIH HHS R01 CA262265US NCI R01CA262265-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Hodgkin lymphoma International Study for Individual Care (HoLISTIC) Consortium's A-HIPI model, developed in 2022 for advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), predicts survival within 5 years amongst newly diagnosed patients. This study validates its performance in the Brazilian Hodgkin lymphoma registry. By 2022, the Brazilian HL registry included 1357 cHL patients, with a median 5-year follow-up. Probabilities for 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using A-HIPI-model equations. Discrimination (Harrell C-statistic/Uno C-statistic) and calibration measures assessed external validation and calibration. Lab values beyond the allowed range were excluded, mirroring the initial A-HIPI analysis. A total of 694 advanced-stage cHL patients met the original inclusion criteria (age 18-65 years, Stage IIB-IV). Median age was 31 years; 46.3% were females. Stage distribution was IIB (33.1%), III (27.4%), IV (39.5%). Bulky disease in 32.6%. Five-year PFS and OS were 68.4% and 86.0%, respectively. Harrell C-statistics were 0.60 for PFS and 0.69 for OS, and Uno C-statistics were 0.63 for PFS and 0.72 for OS. Calibration plots demonstrated well-calibrated predictions with calibration slopes of 0.91 and 1.03 for 5-year OS and PFS, respectively. Despite differing patient, clinical characteristics, and socioeconomic factors, the baseline prediction tool performed well in the Brazilian cohort, demonstrating adequate discrimination and calibration. This supports its reliability in diverse settings.

Indexed as

Hodgkin DiseaseRegistriesRisk AssessmentAdultBrazilCalibrationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicNeoplasm StagingObservational Studies as TopicProgression-Free SurvivalProspective Studiesadvanced stagesA‐HIPIclassical Hodgkin lymphomaprognostic modelvalidation and calibration

Identifiers

PMID39419492
PMCPMC11747895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.