ReviewLaryngo- rhino- otologie2025
[Clinical and molecular epidemiology of malignant salivary gland tumors].
Review in Laryngo- rhino- otologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolic Marker GLUT1 in Salivary Gland Cancers: Quantification and Effect-Size Estimation.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Tissue factor expression in salivary gland carcinoma: a potential novel therapeutic target for advanced disease.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Salivary gland carcinomas are a rare and heterogeneous group of malignant tumors, accounting for 3-6% of all malignant tumors in the head and neck region. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates are 83%, 69% and 63% respectively. Due to new molecular pathological and genetic findings, new entities are constantly being defined as part of the recurring WHO classification of salivary gland carcinomas, so that the incidence rates of the entities are subject to constant change. The only certain risk factor for the development of salivary gland carcinomas is ionizing radiation. In addition, large tumors, cervical lymph node involvement and perineural sheath involvement significantly worsen the prognosis. Today, molecular pathology is coming to the fore, with which potential targets have been identified that can offer prognosis-improving treatment options, particularly in recurrent or distant metastatic stages. Entity-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as axitinib in adenoid cystic carcinoma or larotrectinib in secretory carcinoma and cross-entity therapies such as HER2 inhibition and androgen deprivation can prolong median and progression-free survival with a favorable side effect profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.