ArticleJournal of surgical education2024
Improving the Surgical Education Experience: 9-month Outcomes of an Education Time-Out Pilot Study.
Article in Journal of surgical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The perioperative education time-out and its impact on patient safety outcomes.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Precepting Through Perinatal Emergencies: A Simulation-Based Training for Midwifery Educators.Journal of midwifery & women's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe aimed to: 1) create a Surgical Education Time-Out Tool (SET-OuT) checklist training module for faculty utilizing a highly-realistic simulation and 2) assess faculty and resident perioperative educational experiences pre- and post-SET-OuT intervention. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsWe recruited gynecologic surgical faculty and PGY1 to PGY3 obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) residents from the University of Utah. Each enrolled participant completed a baseline and 9-month survey about their educational experiences and SET-OuT satisfaction. Faculty enrollment required completion of highly-realistic SET-OuT simulation with a simulated resident actor. We compared individual measures and composite teacher self-efficacy scale and composite resident procedural self-confidence scale between time points using rank sum tests. We converted Likert-scale items to 5-point scales and used mixed linear models to investigate whether relationships persisted after accounting for individual surgeons' and residents' effects.
resultsTwenty-five of 62 (40%) faculty and 15/17 (88%) residents enrolled with 100% baseline survey completion. Twenty of 25 (80%) faculty and 12/15 (80%) residents completed the 9-month survey. Faculty scored a median 34/45 points on the self-efficacy scale at baseline and 41/45 points at 9 months (p < 0.01). Faculty demonstrated a 0.9-point improvement in teaching performance satisfaction (p < 0.01). Residents' procedural self-confidence was 16.5/30 at baseline and 22/30 at 9-months (p = 0.01) and felt their value and input in the surgical education experience improved. Residents reported improved satisfaction with feedback at 9-months compared to baseline (p = 0.01). Faculty and residents reported 85% and 100% satisfaction with the ETO as a teaching tool, respectively.
conclusionsImplementation of a perioperative SET-OuT improved faculty teaching self-efficacy and resident procedural confidence. Both groups highly rated the SET-OuT as an acceptable perioperative teaching tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.