ArticleThe American journal of emergency medicine2024
External evaluation of Brain Injury Guideline (BIG) low risk criteria for traumatic brain injury.
Article in The American journal of emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Smart-responsive electrospun scaffolds (SRES) for neural repair: Recent advances and future prospects.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Early (<24 hours) venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in traumatic brain injury: development of the EViTBI algorithm using a national cohort.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFewer than 20 % of traumatic brain injury (TBI) cases with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) result in clinical deterioration. The Brain Injury Guideline (BIG) criteria were published in 2014 and categorize patients with TBI into three risk groups (BIG 1, 2, and 3) based on CT scan findings, neurological examination, anti-coagulant/platelet medications, and intoxication. Early data is promising, suggesting no instances of neurosurgical intervention or death in the low-risk BIG1 category within 30 days. We sought to externally validate the BIG criteria and identify patients with TBI at low risk of clinical deterioration. We hypothesized that patients meeting the BIG1 low risk criteria have less than a 1 % risk of death or neurosurgical intervention.
methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of a level 1 trauma center's trauma registry records from 2011 to 2022 to identify patients with head trauma. We abstracted demographics, injury characteristics, clinical course, CT imaging results, and outcomes, and we categorized patients according to the BIG criteria. The Clopper-Pearson Exact method was used to estimate outcome frequency with confidence intervals. The primary outcome was death or neurosurgical intervention within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included progression on repeat head CT (RHCT), ICU admission with neurocritical care intervention, and TBI-related hospital readmission within 30 days.
resultsA total of 1714 patients with TBI with ICH were identified from the trauma registry. 325 patients were excluded due to missing data, pregnancy, incarceration, polytrauma, or GCS < 13, leaving 1389 for analysis. 193 patients (13.9 %) were classified as BIG1. No patients classified as BIG1 experienced the primary outcome measures of death or neurosurgical intervention (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0 %-1.9 %). The number of patients who experienced the secondary outcome measures of progression on RHCT, ICU admission with neurocritical care intervention, or TBI-related hospital readmission within 30 days were 9 (4.7 %, 95 % CI: 2.2 %-8.7 %), 1 (0.5 %, 95 % CI: 0 %-2.9 %), and 4 (2.1 %, 95 % CI: 0.6 %-5.2 %), respectively.
conclusionBIG1 criteria identified a low-risk subset of patients with TBI with ICH. However, an upper 95 % CI of 1.9 % does not exclude the risk of neurologic deterioration being <1 %. Validation of these criteria in larger cohorts is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.