Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39418647›Full record

Trial reportJMIR dermatology2024

Participant Motivators and Expectations in the MEL-SELF Randomized Clinical Trial of Patient-Led Surveillance for Recurrent Melanoma: Content Analysis of Survey Responses.

Deonna Ackermann, Jolyn Hersch, Dana Jordan, Emily Clinton-Gray, Karen Bracken, Monika Janda, Robin Turner, Katy Bell

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Deonna AckermannSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4089-7823
Jolyn HerschSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5225-6639
Dana JordanSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0009-0000-6746-6516
Emily Clinton-GraySchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0009-0008-6494-8278
Karen BrackenKolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6085-445X
Monika JandaCentre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1728-8085
Robin TurnerBiostatistics Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8540-7365
Katy BellSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0137-3218

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLimited data exist on the motivations and expectations of participants when enrolling in dermatology clinical trials, including melanoma early detection trials. Understanding participant motivators for research engagement has been identified as a prioritized area for trial methodology research.

objectiveThe study aimed to determine motivators of participation and expectations from trial involvement among patients enrolled in the MEL-SELF randomized clinical trial of patient-led surveillance for new or recurrent melanoma.

methodsThe MEL-SELF trial is recruiting patients previously treated for localized melanoma, who own a smartphone, have a partner to assist with skin self-examination (SSE), and attend routinely scheduled follow-up at specialist and primary care skin clinics in Australia. We evaluated responses from the first 100 randomized participants to 2 open-ended questions about their motivations and expectations for participating in the trial, administered through the internet-based baseline questionnaire. A total of 3 coders independently coded the free-text responses and resolved discrepancies through consensus. Qualitative content analysis by an iterative process was used to group responses into themes. Responses from potential participants who were not randomized and the 404 participants randomized subsequently into the trial, were also checked for new themes. Coding and analysis were conducted in Microsoft Excel.

resultsOut of the 100 survey participants, 98 (98%) answered at least 1 of the 2 questions. Overall, responses across the motivation and expectation items indicated 3 broad themes: community benefit, perceived personal benefit, and trusting relationship with their health care provider. The most common motivators for participation were related to community benefit. These included progressing medical research, benefitting future melanoma patients who may have similar experiences, and broader altruistic sentiments such as "helping others" or "giving back." The most common expectations from the trial related to personal benefit. These included perceived improved outcomes such as earlier diagnosis and treatment, access to additional care, and increased self-empowerment to take actions themselves that benefit their health. Patients expressed a desire to gain health-related knowledge and skills and were interested in the potential advantages of teledermatology. There were no new themes in responses from those who were not randomized or were randomized subsequent to the first 100.

conclusionsWe report a tailorable, patient-focused approach to identify drivers of research engagement in clinical research. Clinical trials offer an opportunity to collate a substantial evidence base on determinants of research participation and to identify context-specific factors. Results from the MEL-SELF trial emphasized notable altruism, self-empowerment, and perceived advantages of teledermatology as specific motivators. These findings informed consent processes, recruitment, retention, response to trial tasks, and intervention adherence for the MEL-SELF host trial.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12621000176864. https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=379527.

Indexed as

MelanomaMotivationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSkin NeoplasmsAdultAgedAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationSelf-ExaminationSurveys and Questionnairescancerclinical trialsdermatologydermatology clinical trialsearly detectionmelanomamobile phonerandomized controlled trialstudies within a trialSWATsteledermatologytrial recruitment and retention

Identifiers

PMID39418647
PMCPMC11528161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.