Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39418644›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2024

Lower-intensity CPX-351 plus venetoclax induction for adults with newly diagnosed AML unfit for intensive chemotherapy.

Geoffrey L Uy, Vinod Pullarkat, Praneeth Baratam, Robert K Stuart, Roland B Walter, Eric S Winer, Qi Wang, Stefan Faderl, Divya Chakravarthy, Diane Menno and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04038437 (A Phase 1b Trial of CPX-351 Lower Intensity Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04038437 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase 1b Trial of CPX-351 Lower Intensity Therapy (LIT) Plus Venetoclax as First Line Treatment for Subjects With AML Who Are Unfit for Intensive Chemotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorJazz PharmaceuticalsRan2019 to 2022Enrolled35ConditionsAcute Myeloid LeukemiaArmsCPX-351, Venetoclax
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Geoffrey L UyDivision of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0002-7809-0996
Vinod PullarkatDivision of Leukemia, Department of Hematology & Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Gehr Family Center for Leukemia Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA.
Praneeth BaratamHematology/Oncology Division, Department of Medicine, Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.ORCID 0000-0002-3129-9047
Robert K StuartHematology/Oncology Division, Department of Medicine, Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Roland B WalterTranslational Science and Therapeutics Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.ORCID 0000-0002-9268-3341
Eric S WinerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-4515-8245
Qi WangJazz Pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA.
Stefan FaderlJazz Pharmaceuticals, Palo Alto, CA.
Divya ChakravarthyJazz Pharmaceuticals, Palo Alto, CA.
Diane MennoJazz Pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA.
Ronald S CheungJazz Pharmaceuticals, Palo Alto, CA.
Tara L LinDivision of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.ORCID 0000-0002-0242-6449

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractPreclinical data suggest a rationale for combining CPX-351, a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine, with venetoclax, a B-cell lymphoma-2 inhibitor. This phase 1b study evaluated lower-intensity CPX-351 combined with venetoclax in adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) considered unfit/ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. In a dose-exploration phase using a 3+3 design, patients received stepwise dosing of CPX-351 IV on days 1 and 3 plus venetoclax 400 mg orally on days 2 to 21 per cycle to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for this combination. During the expansion phase, additional patients received CPX-351 plus venetoclax at the identified RP2D. The primary end points were the RP2D and safety of CPX-351 combined with venetoclax. Secondary end points included preliminary efficacy and pharmacokinetics. Overall, 35 patients were enrolled in the study. A RP2D of CPX-351 30 units/m2 (daunorubicin 13.2 mg/m2 and cytarabine 30 mg/m2) plus venetoclax 400 mg was established. The safety profile of the combination was consistent with the known safety profiles of CPX-351 and venetoclax. Complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) was achieved by 17 of 35 patients (49%), all after cycle 1; of these, 14 were negative for measurable residual disease. CR was achieved by 1 of 8 patients (13%) with a mutation in TP53, and CR/CRi was achieved by 15 of 26 patients (58%) with wild-type TP53. This study highlights that lower-intensity therapy of CPX-351 plus venetoclax as induction therapy provides a well-tolerated treatment option in adults with AML deemed unfit for intensive chemotherapy. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04038437.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicCytarabineDaunorubicinLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteSulfonamidesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicCPX-351CytarabineDaunorubicinSulfonamidesvenetoclax

Identifiers

PMID39418644
PMCPMC11699081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.