Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39418590›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2024

Divided Attention Has Limited Effects on Speech Sensorimotor Control.

Jenna Krakauer, Chris Naber, Caroline A Niziolek, Benjamin Parrell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sensorimotor Adaptation to a Nonuniform Formant Perturbation Is Preserved in Healthy Aging.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026
    Article
  2. Autonomic Arousal During Speech Production and Sensorimotor Adaptation.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jenna KrakauerDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Chris NaberWaisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison.ORCID 0000-0002-0399-5643
Caroline A NiziolekDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison.ORCID 0000-0002-6085-1371
Benjamin ParrellDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison.ORCID 0000-0003-2610-2884

Funding

The role of the cerebellum in speechR01DC017091 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI John Francis Houde, RICHARD IVRY · 2019 to 2026
$4.5M
Establishing the clinical utility of sensorimotor adaptation for speech rehabilitationR01DC019134 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI NIZIOLEK, CAROLINE, PARRELL, BENJAMIN · 2021 to 2025
$2.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017091NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC019134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhen vowel formants are externally perturbed, speakers change their production to oppose that perturbation both during the ongoing production (compensation) and in future productions (adaptation). To date, attempts to explain the large variability across individuals in these responses have focused on trait-based characteristics such as auditory acuity, but evidence from other motor domains suggests that attention may modulate the motor response to sensory perturbations. Here, we test the extent to which divided attention impacts sensorimotor control for supralaryngeal articulation.

methodNeurobiologically healthy speakers were exposed to random (Experiment 1) or consistent (Experiment 2) real-time auditory perturbation of vowel formants to measure online compensation and trial-to-trial adaptation, respectively. In both experiments, participants completed two conditions: one with a simultaneous visual distractor task to divide attention and one without this secondary task.

resultsDivided visual attention slightly reduced online compensation, but only starting > 300 ms after vowel onset, well beyond the typical duration of vowels in speech. Divided attention had no effect on adaptation.

conclusionsThe results from both experiments suggest that the use of sensory feedback in typical speech motor control is a largely automatic process unaffected by divided visual attention, suggesting that the source of cross-speaker variability in response to formant perturbations likely lies within the speech production system rather than in higher-level cognitive processes. Methodologically, these results suggest that compensation for formant perturbations should be measured prior to 300 ms after vowel onset to avoid any potential impact of attention or other higher-order cognitive factors.

Indexed as

AttentionSpeechAdaptation, PhysiologicalAdolescentAdultFeedback, SensoryFemaleHumansMaleSpeech PerceptionVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39418590
PMCPMC11567081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.