ArticleDiabetes2025
Multiomic Mendelian Randomization Study Investigating the Impact of PCSK9 and HMGCR Inhibition on Type 2 Diabetes Across Five Populations.
Article in Diabetes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oral PCSK9 inhibitors for elevated LDL-C: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Toll-Like Receptors in Diabetes: Immunometabolic Mechanisms and Emerging Precision Therapeutic Strategies.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Genetically modeled GLP1R and GIPR agonism reduce binge drinking and alcohol-associated phenotypes: a multi-ancestry drug-target Mendelian randomization study.Molecular psychiatry · 2025Article
- Race, ethnicity and ancestry in global diabetes research: grappling with complexity to advance equity and scientific integrity - a narrative review and viewpoint.Diabetologia · 2025Review
- The Impact of PCSK9 on Diabetic Cardiomyopathy: Mechanisms and Implications.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Article
- Exploring the Pleiotropy of PCSK9: A Wide Range of Influences from Lipid Regulation to Extrahepatic Function.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) varies among populations of different races/ethnicities. The influence of genetically proxied LDL cholesterol lowering through proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 (PCSK9) and HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR) on T2D in non-European populations is not well established. A drug target Mendelian randomization approach was used to assess the effects of PCSK9 and HMGCR inhibition on T2D risk and glycemic traits in five populations: East Asian (EAS), South Asian (SAS), Hispanic (HISP), African (AFR), and Europe (EUR). Our study did not find relationships between genetically proxied PCSK9 inhibition and T2D risk in the EAS (odds ratio [OR] 1.02; 95% CI 0.95-1.10), SAS (1.05; 0.97-1.14), HISP (1.03; 0.94-1.12), or EUR population (1.04; 0.98-1.11). However, in the AFR population, primary analyses suggested an increased risk of T2D resulting from PCSK9 inhibition (OR 1.53; 95% CI 1.058-2.22; P = 0.024), although this was not supported in sensitivity analyses. Genetically proxied HMGCR inhibition was associated with an increased risk of T2D in SAS (OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.30-1.61; P = 9.8 × 10-12), EAS (1.36; 1.22-1.51; P = 4.2 × 10-10), and EUR populations (1.52; 1.21-1.90; P = 3.3 × 10-4). These results were consistent across various sensitivity analyses, including colocalization, indicating a robust finding. The findings indicate a neutral impact of long-term PCSK9 inhibition on T2D and glycemic markers in most non-EUR populations, with a potential increased risk in AFR cohorts. By contrast, HMGCR inhibition increased the risk of T2D in SAS, EAS, and EUR cohorts, underscoring the need to consider diversity in genetic research on metabolic diseases. ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.