ArticleChemistry & biodiversity2025
LC-MS/MS Profiling, Biological Activities and Molecular Docking Studies of Simmondsia Chinensis Leaves.
Article in Chemistry & biodiversity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigation of Antioxidant, In Silico and In Vivo Antiulcer Activities of New Natural Xanthenone and Antracenone Isolated fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative Study of Sulfated Polysaccharides From Ulva Lactuca Grown in Tunisia and Morocco: in Vitro Antioxidant Activity and in Vivo Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Ulcer Effects.Chemistry & biodiversity · 2026Article
- LC-HESI-MS/MS Profiling and Evaluation of Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, Anti-α-Amylase, and Anti-Acetylcholinesterase Activities of Rhus tripartitum L. Leaf Extract: In Vitro and In Silico Studies.Chemistry & biodiversity · 2026Article
- Analyzing potential of next-generation probiotics in cancer management.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- LC-MS/MS Profiling, Biological Activities and Molecular Docking Studies of Simmondsia Chinensis Leaves.Chemistry & biodiversity · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the biological activities of Tunisian Simmondsia chinensis and characterize its potential bioactive compounds. Different extracts of S. chinensis were tested for their antioxidant, antibacterial, anti-α-amylase, and anti-acetylcholinesterase activities through in vitro assays. The methanolic extract exhibited the highest levels of antioxidant activity and total phenolic content (976.03 GAE/g extract) compared to the other extracts. Additionally, it demonstrated a substantial anti-acetylcholinesterase activity (PI=75 %) and potent antibacterial property, particularly against Enterococcus faecalis, Listeria monocytogenes, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus subtilis, and Salmonella enterica. The IC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.