Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39418422›Full record

SynthesisFamilies, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare2024

Rural healthcare workers' well-being: A systematic review of support interventions.

Mansoor Malik, Martina Penalosa, Isolde Martina Busch, Haroon Burhanullah, Christine Weston, Kristina Weeks, Cheryl Connors, Henry J Michtalik, George Everly, Albert W Wu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mansoor MalikDepartment of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Martina PenalosaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Isolde Martina BuschDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona.
Haroon BurhanullahDepartment of Psychiatry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Christine WestonDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Kristina WeeksDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University.
Cheryl ConnorsDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Henry J MichtalikThe Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University.
George EverlyDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Albert W WuDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Funding

A Website for Outpatient Quality of Life AssessmentR21CA113223 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WU, ALBERT W. · 2005 to 2006
$208k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA113223
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough there is increased awareness about healthcare workers' (HCWs') stress and burnout after the COVID-19 pandemic, support interventions should be tailored according to the needs of HCWs. Given the unique challenges rural HCWs face, we sought to systematically identify the types of interventions specifically designed and utilized to support the well-being of HCWs practicing in rural settings.

methodWe conducted a comprehensive search of the existing literature through electronic databases to identify quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies describing supportive interventions for rural HCWs with well-being-related outcomes between January 1, 2023 and March 31, 2023. We used the Effective Public Health Practice Project, Mixed Methods Assessment Tool, and Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist to evaluate the study quality.

findingsOut of 1,583 identified records, 25 studies were included in the analysis. The studies described a wide range of supportive interventions and outcomes. The overall quality of the studies was weak to moderate. None of the studies were randomized and only six included controls. Included interventions were generally well- accepted. Quantitative and qualitative themes identified shared decision making, effective supervision, and proactive cultural change as promising interventions that warrant further exploration. Financial interventions alone were not effective. Most of the studies were either unfunded or were funded internally by the institutions.

conclusionsThere is limited research in support interventions for rural HCWs. Larger, well-designed studies are needed to explore promising interventions to promote well-being of rural healthcare workforce. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

COVID-19Health PersonnelRural Health ServicesBurnout, ProfessionalHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID39418422
PMCPMC12079686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.