Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39418346›Full record

Observational studyThe oncologist2024

Palbociclib plus aromatase inhibitors in patients with metastatic breast cancer and cardiovascular diseases: real-world effectiveness.

Adam Brufsky, Xianchen Liu, Benjamin Li, Lynn McRoy, Connie Chen, Doris Makari, Rachel M Layman, Hope S Rugo

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The oncologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05361655 (Real-World Treatment Effectiveness of Palbociclib in Combination With an Aromatase Inhibitor as 1st Line Therapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05361655 completednot on this map

Real-World Treatment Effectiveness of Palbociclib in Combination With an Aromatase Inhibitor as 1st Line Therapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorPfizerRan2021 to 2021Enrolled2,888ConditionsMetastatic Breast CancerArmsPalbociclib + an aromatase inhibitor, Aromatase inhibitor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adam BrufskyDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8080-7960
Xianchen LiuPfizer Inc, New York, NY 10001, United States.
Benjamin LiPfizer Inc, New York, NY 10001, United States.
Lynn McRoyPfizer Inc, New York, NY 10001, United States.
Connie ChenPfizer Inc, New York, NY 10001, United States.
Doris MakariPfizer Inc, New York, NY 10001, United States.
Rachel M LaymanDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States.
Hope S RugoDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.

Funding

Pfizer
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) comorbidities are often excluded from participating in breast cancer clinical trials. Consequently, data to inform treatment decisions for patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and CVD are limited.

objectiveWe compared the effectiveness of first-line palbociclib plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) vs an AI alone and evaluated palbociclib treatment patterns in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC and CVD in routine clinical practice.

methodsData from the Flatiron Health Analytic Database were captured for patients with HR+/HER2- mBC and CVD who initiated first-line treatment with palbociclib plus an AI or an AI alone between February 2015 and March 2020 (data cutoff: September 30, 2020). Overall survival (OS), real-world progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment patterns were evaluated.

resultsOf the 469 patients with identifiable CVD, 160 received palbociclib plus an AI, and 309 received an AI alone. After stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting, both median OS (40.7 vs 26.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.732 [95% CI, 0.537-0.997]; P = .048) and median real-world PFS (20.0 vs 12.5 months; HR, 0.679 [95% CI, 0.512-0.900]; P = .007) were significantly prolonged in patients treated with palbociclib plus an AI vs an AI alone. Among patients with a documented palbociclib starting dose, 78.5% started palbociclib at 125 mg/day, and 38.6% experienced dose adjustment.

conclusionsIn this real-world analysis, first-line palbociclib plus an AI was associated with improved effectiveness compared with an AI alone in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC and CVD.

trial registrationNCT05361655 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAromatase InhibitorsBreast NeoplasmsCardiovascular DiseasesPiperazinesPyridinesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisAromatase InhibitorspalbociclibPiperazinesPyridinesbreast neoplasmscardiovascular diseasescomparative effectiveness researchelectronic health recordspalbociclibretrospective studies

Identifiers

PMID39418346
PMCPMC11630750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.