ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024
We need to understand "when" not "if" generative AI can enhance personalized persuasion.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The "synthetic validity" problem in AI-generated science.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Can AI help reduce prejudice? Evaluating the effectiveness of AI-powered personalized persuasion on support for transgender rights.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- Corpus-level behavioral intensity in human-AI conversations.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- How topic content shapes LLM personality-tailored persuasion: semantic anchoring and topic stereotype effects.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- A meta-analysis of the persuasive power of large language models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Reply to Teeny and Matz: Toward the robust measurement of personalized persuasion with generative AI.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.