SynthesisPloS one2024
Experiences and perceptions of patients with ankylosing spondylitis: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment Adherence, Psychosocial Factors, and Clinical Outcomes in Repeatedly Hospitalized Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis: An Exploratory Mid-Term Longitudinal Mixed-Effects Study.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Observational
- Patients' Perspectives Regarding Ankylosing Spondylitis Treatment Administration Features: Evidence from Qualitative Interviews and a Multinational Quantitative Preference Survey.Rheumatology and therapy · 2026Article
- The value of EQ-5D-3L and EQ VAS as a patient-reported outcome measure for patients with ankylosing spondylitis in routine healthcare: an evaluation of construct validity and responsiveness based on the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe systematic evaluation of relevant qualitative studies on the experiences of patients with ankylosing spondylitis provides a foundation for the clinical development of personalized disease management programs for this patient category.
methodsMultiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, CNKI, Wanfang, CBM, and VIP, were searched for qualitative research literature on the experiences of patients with ankylosing spondylitis from the inception of databases to March 2024. Eligible studies were included, and quality was assessed using the quality evaluation standard of qualitative research at the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI), Australia (2016). The results were integrated using the meta-aggregation approach.
resultsA total of 11 papers were included in the review. Four themes and 10 subthemes were synthesized: (1) difficulties in diagnosis and treatment; (2) effects of disease symptoms; (3) maladjustment of social roles; and (4) lack of support for disease response.
conclusionMedical staff should leverage the advantages of the Internet to enhance knowledge and education on ankylosing spondylitis. They should focus on patients' mental health, assist in active self-management, provide personalized interventions, promote recovery, and improve the quality of life for patients. Additionally, society should offer a diverse range of support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.