ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
Deep learning-based enhancement of fluorescence labeling for accurate cell lineage tracing during embryogenesis.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cell lineage tracing: Methods, applications, and challenges.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationAutomated cell lineage tracing throughout embryogenesis plays a key role in the study of regulatory control of cell fate differentiation, morphogenesis and organogenesis in the development of animals, including nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. However, automated cell lineage tracing suffers from an exponential increase in errors at late embryo because of the dense distribution of cells, relatively low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and imbalanced intensity profiles of fluorescence images, which demands a huge amount of human effort to manually correct the errors. The existing image enhancement methods are not sensitive enough to deal with the challenges posed by the crowdedness and low signal-to-noise ratio. An alternative method is urgently needed to assist the existing detection methods in improving their detection and tracing accuracy, thereby reducing the huge burden for manual curation.
resultsWe developed a new method, termed as DELICATE, that dramatically improves the accuracy of automated cell lineage tracing especially during the stage post 350 cells of C. elegans embryo. DELICATE works by increasing the local SNR and improving the evenness of nuclei fluorescence intensity across cells especially in the late embryos. The method both dramatically reduces the segmentation errors by StarryNite and the time required for manually correcting tracing errors up to 550-cell stage, allowing the generation of accurate cell lineage at large-scale with a user-friendly software/interface. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All images and data are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26778475.v1. The code and user-friendly software are available at https://github.com/plcx/NucApp-develop.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.