Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39418021›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Person-Centered Care Planning for People Living With or at Risk for Multiple Chronic Conditions.

Brittany N Watson, Lilly Estenson, Aimee R Eden, Maya T Gerstein, Maria Torroella Carney, Vonetta M Dotson, Trisha Milnes, Arlene S Bierman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Barriers and enablers for health system reform.Frontiers in health services · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Brittany N WatsonDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Lilly EstensonLeonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Aimee R EdenAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland.
Maya T GersteinAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland.
Maria Torroella CarneyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York.
Vonetta M DotsonAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland.
Trisha MilnesCharlie Norwood VA Medical Center, Augusta, Georgia.
Arlene S BiermanAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The US has a growing population of people living with multiple chronic conditions (MCC), yet the health system is ill designed to meet their needs. Person-centered care planning (PCCP) is an approach to provide comprehensive care that is responsive to the individual to improve health outcomes and increase value. Objective: To examine strategies used to provide PCCP for people living with or at risk for MCC, as well as facilitators and barriers to implementation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study uses thematic analysis of responses from a Request for Information (RFI) published in the Federal Register soliciting input on PCCP, posted by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) in 2022. The RFI was available for public comment from September 16, 2022, to November 15, 2022. Responses were analyzed between January 2023 and February 2024. Respondents were individuals and organizations who identify as, provide care for, or seek to improve care for individuals living with or at risk for MCC. Some responses represent multiple individuals. Main Outcomes and Measures: Qualitative themes and subthemes of the RFI responses, developed using thematic analysis through inductive and deductive coding of the open-text responses. Results: There were a total of 58 respondents, including clinicians, researchers, patients, caregivers, and representatives from health care payer, practitioner, health system, advocacy, professional, and supporting nonprofit and industry organizations. Researchers identified 9 themes: (1) suboptimal quality of care; (2) person-centered, goal-concordant care; (3) multidisciplinary team-based care and care coordination; (4) prevention across the life course; (5) digital health solutions; (6) workflow; (7) education and self-management support; (8) payment; and (9) achieving community, health system, and payer goals. Conclusions and Relevance: In this qualitative study of PCCP for people living with or at risk for MCC, challenges to widescale adoption of PCCP were identified along with strategies to address these challenges, including the alignment of payment, policy support, culture change, adoption of meaningful measures, and the need for evidence on strategies to scale and spread PCCP. Insights gained from this analysis can inform research priorities and implementation efforts to advance PCCP as an integral component of routine care.

Indexed as

Multiple Chronic ConditionsPatient-Centered CareQualitative ResearchFemaleHumansMalePatient Care PlanningUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39418021
PMCPMC11581598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.