Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39418019›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Asian American Diversity and Representation in the Health Care Workforce, 2007 to 2022.

Michelle Ko, Kevin Dinh, Sarah Iv, Monica Hahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Distress Profiles and Help-Seeking Behaviors Among Diverse Healthcare Workers Participating in a Mental Health Screening Program.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michelle KoDivision of Health Policy and Management, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis.
Kevin DinhDepartment of Economics, University of California, Davis.
Sarah IvOffice of Health Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion, University of California Davis Health.
Monica HahnDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Asian American individuals comprise over 40 ethnoracial groups but are regularly aggregated into 1 category within health workforce analysis, thus obscuring substantial inequities in representation. Objectives: To describe trends in Asian American diversity across the 4 most populous US health professions (physicians, registered nurses, nursing assistants, and home health aides) and to characterize subgroup representation within professions. Design, Setting, and Participants: Serial cross-sectional study from American Community Survey (ACS) population estimates of people reporting health profession occupations from 2007 to 2022. The ACS samples US residents every day, with approximately 3.5 million surveyed each year. Based on their sampling methods, the ACS then produces estimates of the entire US population for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year periods. Data were analyzed from April to August 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: For each year and subgroup, the proportions of the US population, the profession, and Asian American individuals within the profession were calculated. The representation quotient (RQ) of each subgroup was then calculated, defined as the proportion of the subgroup within the profession of interest divided by the proportion of the subgroup within the US population. Trends were examined over the 15-year period. Results: Over the 15-year period, Indian Americans composed the largest percentage of Asian American physicians (mean [SD], 40.6% [1.6%]), followed by Chinese Americans (mean [SD], 18.9% [1.4%]). Pakistani and Indian Americans had the highest relative representation (mean [SD] RQ, 8.9 [0.9] and 7.8 [0.9], respectively). Conversely, Cambodian and Hmong Americans remained largely underrepresented (mean [SD] RQ, 0.2 [0.2] for both). Filipinx Americans accounted for more than half of Asian American registered nurses and nursing assistants, with high relative representation (mean [SD] RQ, 5.6 (0.3) and 2.9 [0.4], respectively). Bangladeshi and Chinese American relative representation were high among home health aides (mean [SD] RQ, 4.1 [1.5] and 2.7 [0.5], respectively). Asian American individuals accounted for an estimated 22% of physicians (approximately 260 693 respondents), 10% of registered nurses (approximately 420 418 respondents), 4.8% of nursing assistants (approximately 93 913 respondents), and 8.3% of home health aides (approximately 60 968 respondents) in 2022. Conclusions and Relevance: By examining disaggregated data, this study found persistent inequities among Asian American subgroups in the health workforce. Reducing Asian American populations to a single racialized group erases subgroup differences rooted in histories of racism, colonialism, and xenophobia; enables false narratives of Asian American overrepresentation and success; and hampers progress in advancing health justice.

Indexed as

AsianCultural DiversityHealth WorkforceAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited States

Identifiers

PMID39418019
PMCPMC11581573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.