ArticleJAMA network open2024
Accessibility of and Barriers to Long-Term Follow-Up Care for Childhood Cancer Survivors.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Barriers and facilitators associated with long-term follow-up care for childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Survivorship Care After Childhood Cancer: A Systematic Review of Reported Barriers and Facilitators.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterPooled it
- Risk-based long-term follow-up care for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on Chinese Children's Cancer Group ALL-2015 protocol.Chinese medical journal · 2026Article
- Mapping the health management journey of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Expert consensus on disease-based long-term follow-up care plans for childhood cancer survivors.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2025Review
- Understanding family perspectives: knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding pediatric lymphoma in China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Mapping of current resources and models of care for paediatric cancer survivors in Asia: a multinational survey.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Review
- Case Report: Multidisciplinary management and nursing care for a preterm infant with rare extrarenal malignant rhabdoid tumor: a clinical case study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Bibliometric analysis of transition readiness in adolescents with chronic diseases.Health care transitions · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Childhood cancer survivorship programs and long-term follow-up (LTFU) practices are inadequate in most regions of China. Objective: To understand the clinician and caregiver perceptions of LTFU care and to identify barriers to adherence to LTFU care in mainland China. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study had a 2-phase sequential mixed-methods approach, consisting of a cross-sectional survey followed by semistructured interviews. Participants included oncology clinicians recruited through an educational seminar on LTFU and caregivers recruited through convenience sampling. Data were collected from November 2022 to September 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: The clinician survey and interview focused on the standards and resources for LTFU care at their practicing institution and barriers to the coordination of LTFU care. For caregivers, the survey and interview focused on their awareness of and participation in LTFU care and their opinions on future LTFU care visits. Results: A total of 101 clinicians (28 [27.7%] male; 73 [72.3%] female; 46 [45.6%] aged >40 to 50 years) completed the survey (response rate: 90.2%) representing 32 institutions from 22 provinces. As for the caregivers' survey, 164 eligible participants (36 [22.0%] male; 128 [78.0%] female) were recruited (response rate: 20.2%). The majority of the caregivers had received a high school or greater education (96 [56.7%]) and were parents of CCSs diagnosed with leukemia (67 [40.9%]), lymphoma or solid tumors (47 [28.7%]), or conditions requiring hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (50 [30.5%]). Most clinicians (74 [73.3%]) reported providing late effects care, yet only 10 (13.5%) had a dedicated follow-up clinic for CCSs. Two-thirds (64 [63.4%]) reported that the LTFU plan for each survivor is solely determined by their clinical judgment. In structured interviews, all doctors admitted to deviating from published guidelines due to challenges in implementing screening recommendations in their settings. Barriers to providing LTFU services included patient-related factors (76 [75.2%]), survivor knowledge deficits (61 [60.4%]), and the absence of dedicated LTFU clinics (61 [60.4%]). Among caregivers responding to the survey, 60 (36.6%) had never heard of late effects. Overall, 22 of 26 caregivers (84.6%) who participated in the interviews were not aware of potential late effects, although 17 (68.0%) could articulate existing conditions and symptoms that their children were experiencing. Conclusions: In this mixed-methods study involving clinicians and caregivers, substantial disparities in the uniformity and accessibility of LTFU in China were observed, suggesting the imperative need for a standardized approach to LTFU care for survivors. This includes advocating for establishment of dedicated clinics, alongside an emphasis on enhanced education and training for both clinicians and caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.