ArticleSpine deformity2025
Investigating the long-term outcomes and efficacy of surgical intervention in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and Cobb angles ranging between 40 and 50 degrees.
Article in Spine deformity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Outcomes of high-compliance bracing in patients with severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis declining operative intervention.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePatients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are either managed with non-operative strategies or surgery depending on the severity of lateral curvature and impact on quality of life. However, supportive evidence for the appropriate treatment approach is lacking in AIS patients with Cobb angles between 40 and 50 degrees. Therefore, we investigated differences in long-term patient-centered outcomes in AIS patients with Cobb angles between 40 and 50 degrees who received either operative or non-operative management.
methodsA total of 919 patients aged 10-21 years old with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and 40-50 degree Cobb angles were identified from the HARMS Study Group (HSG) registry and dichotomized based on operative or non-operative management. Baseline and 2 year follow-up SRS-22 scores from these patients were analyzed for significant differences between the total score values, domain values, and the magnitude of score change over time using multiple comparisons analyses. Multivariable regressions adjusting for age, body mass index, location of spinal deformity, and management strategy were also performed.
resultsOperative versus non-operative strategy was significantly, independently associated with differences in SRS-22 total and domain scores over time (effect likelihood ratio test, p < 0.03 for all regressions). Operatively managed patients had significantly greater improvement in SRS-22 total and domain scores over the follow-up duration compared to non-operatively managed patients (p < 0.02 for all comparisons).
conclusionsThis preliminary analysis suggests that operatively managed patients may have had better long-term outcomes than non-operatively managed patients within this AIS subpopulation. These findings support the need for further prospective investigation to determine the optimal management strategy to improve evidence-based, patient-reported outcomes for AIS patients with Cobb angles between 40 and 50 degrees. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39417986What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.