ArticleScience China. Life sciences2025
Predicting Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus-Streptococcus thermophilus interactions based on a highly accurate semi-supervised learning method.
Article in Science China. Life sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Probiotics and Fermented Foods in Human Nutrition.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- LNMGAT: a laplacian regularized pseudo-negative mining graph attention network for robust drug-target interaction prediction under multi-scenario cold-start settings.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Optimization of Chemical Defined Medium forEngineering in life sciences · 2025Article
- The application of machine learning in clinical microbiology and infectious diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus (L. bulgaricus) and Streptococcus thermophilus (S. thermophilus) are commonly used starters in milk fermentation. Fermentation experiments revealed that L. bulgaricus-S. thermophilus interactions (LbStI) substantially impact dairy product quality and production. Traditional biological humidity experiments are time-consuming and labor-intensive in screening interaction combinations, an artificial intelligence-based method for screening interactive starter combinations is necessary. However, in the current research on artificial intelligence based interaction prediction in the field of bioinformatics, most successful models adopt supervised learning methods, and there is a lack of research on interaction prediction with only a small number of labeled samples. Hence, this study aimed to develop a semi-supervised learning framework for predicting LbStI using genomic data from 362 isolates (181 per species). The framework consisted of a two-part model: a co-clustering prediction model (based on the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) dataset) and a Laplacian regularized least squares prediction model (based on K-mer analysis and gene composition of all isolates datasets). To enhance accuracy, we integrated the separate outcomes produced by each component of the two-part model to generate the ultimate LbStI prediction results, which were verified through milk fermentation experiments. Validation through milk fermentation experiments confirmed a high precision rate of 85% (17/20; validated with 20 randomly selected combinations of expected interacting isolates). Our data suggest that the biosynthetic pathways of cysteine, riboflavin, teichoic acid, and exopolysaccharides, as well as the ATP-binding cassette transport systems, contribute to the mutualistic relationship between these starter bacteria during milk fermentation. However, this finding requires further experimental verification. The presented model and data are valuable resources for academics and industry professionals interested in screening dairy starter cultures and understanding their interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39417929What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.