Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39417900›Full record

Trial reportJournal of autism and developmental disorders2026

Gastrointestinal, Behaviour and Anxiety Outcomes in Autistic Children Following an Open Label, Randomised Pilot Study of Synbiotics vs Synbiotics and Gut-Directed Hypnotherapy.

Leanne K Mitchell, Helen S Heussler, Christopher J Burgess, Ateequr Rehman, Robert E Steinert, Peter S W Davies

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Supplementation with abioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leanne K MitchellChild Health Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia. leanne.mitchell@uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7926-6132
Helen S HeusslerChild Health Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Christopher J BurgessChild Health Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Ateequr RehmanDSM-Firmenich, Health, Nutrition & Care (HNC), Kaiseraugst, Switzerland.
Robert E SteinertDSM-Firmenich, Health, Nutrition & Care (HNC), Kaiseraugst, Switzerland.
Peter S W DaviesChild Health Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alterations of the microbiome-gut-brain (MGB) axis have been associated with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). DGBI are highly prevalent in autistic children and are associated with worsening behaviour and anxiety. Treatments such as probiotics, prebiotics and gut-directed hypnotherapy (GDH) have shown efficacy in improving gut symptoms in children. The primary objective of the study was to compare changes in gastrointestinal (GI) scores following a 12-week intervention of synbiotics (prebiotic + probiotic) +/- GDH with a follow-up at 24 weeks. Secondary objectives included changes in behavioural and anxiety symptoms, while changes in gut microbiome composition were assessed as an exploratory objective. Children diagnosed with ASD aged 5.00-10.99 years (n = 40) were recruited and randomised (1:1) to a 12-week intervention of either synbiotics (SYN group) or synbiotics + GDH (COM group). Both the SYN and COM group experienced significant reductions in total GI scores post-intervention and at follow-up (p < 0.001), with no superiority of the COM treatment over the SYN treatment. The COM group showed beneficial reductions in anxiety scores (p = 0.002) and irritability behaviours (p < 0.001) which were not present in the SYN group. At follow-up, only those in the COM group maintained significant reductions in GI pain scores (p < 0.001). There were significant changes in gut microbiota such as increases in Bifidobacterium animalis and Dialister in both groups over time. In conclusion, synbiotics with or without GDH may help support standard care for autistic children who suffer comorbid DGBI. The trial was prospectively registered at clinicialtrials.gov on 16 November 2020 (NCTO4639141).

Indexed as

AnxietyAutism Spectrum DisorderGastrointestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHypnosisSynbioticsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsProbioticsTreatment OutcomeAsperger’sAutismFunctional gastrointestinal disordersGut-brainGut disorders

Identifiers

PMID39417900
PMCPMC12935829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.