Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39417886›Full record

ArticleArchives of microbiology2024

Streamlined boiling lysis DNA extraction for Gram-positive aquaculture pathogen Streptococcus agalactiae.

Syahir Habib, Mohammad Noor Amal Azmai, Ina-Salwany Md Yasin, Noor Azlina Masdor, Nur Azura Mohd Said, Nur Adeela Yasid

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Syahir HabibDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-8942-1745
Mohammad Noor Amal AzmaiAquatic Animal Health and Therapeutics Laboratory, Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7664-9821
Ina-Salwany Md YasinAquatic Animal Health and Therapeutics Laboratory, Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2905-2915
Noor Azlina MasdorBiotechnology and Nanotechnology Research Centre, Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0200-2598
Nur Azura Mohd SaidBiotechnology and Nanotechnology Research Centre, Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Nur Adeela YasidDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. adeela@upm.edu.my.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1278-0206

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate genetic analysis is essential for the detection of pathogens as it necessitates suitable DNA extraction methods tailored to specific microorganisms such as Gram-positive bacteria. This study examined several commercial and simplified DNA extraction methods for their suitability in isothermal downstream applications. Extracted DNA was assessed using spectrophotometry, electrophoresis, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) while its stability was inspected after five months of storage. The findings revealed variations in DNA yield, purity and integrity among the extraction methods. While extraction kits demonstrated high yield and purity, the in-house extraction techniques showed incoherent correlation between yield and purity, yet showed promise for a streamlined extraction process. The DNA acquired from all methods yielded positive amplification in PCR and LAMP. DNA extracted by kits exhibits prolonged stability than those obtained via boiling lysis. Both methods offer distinct advantages, with commercial kits providing longer stability and high-quality DNA while boiling lysis stands out for its simplicity, with shorter handling and processing periods. This study emphasizes selecting ideal extraction methods for Streptococcus agalactiae, in the prospect of aquaculture settings. In particular, successful LAMP reaction suggests that boiled extracts are feasible enough for detection, and suited for point-of-care (POC) testing where prompt detection of aquatic pathogens is often critical. Ultimately, the choice of method should be contemplated on a case-by-case basis such as the study goals, intended settings, and type of samples.

Indexed as

DNA, BacterialNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesStreptococcus agalactiaeAquacultureMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionDNA, BacterialBoiling lysisDNA extractionLoop-mediated isothermal amplificationStreptococcus agalactiae

Identifiers

PMID39417886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.