ArticleMicrobial ecology2024
The Fungal Side of the Story: Saprotrophic- vs. Symbiotrophic-Predicted Ecological Roles of Fungal Communities in Two Meromictic Hypersaline Lakes from Romania.
Article in Microbial ecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Revealing unexplored bacterial and fungal variability in interconnected Antarctic brines.Current research in microbial sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over three-quarters of Earth's surface exhibits extreme environments where life thrives under harsh physicochemical conditions. While prokaryotes have often been investigated in these environments, only recent studies have revealed the remarkable adaptability of eukaryotes, in particular fungi. This study explored the mycobiota of two meromictic hypersaline lakes, Ursu and Fără Fund, in Transylvania (Romania). The intrinsic and extrinsic fungal diversity was assessed using amplicon sequencing of environmental DNA samples from sediments, water columns, surrounding soils, and an associated rivulet. The fungal communities, illustrated by the 18S rRNA gene and ITS2 region, exhibited contrasting patterns between the lakes. The ITS2 region assessed better than the 18S rRNA gene the fungal diversity. The ITS2 data showed that Ascomycota was the most abundant fungal group identified in both lakes, followed by Aphelidiomycota, Chytridiomycota, and Basidiomycota. Despite similar α-diversity levels, significant differences in fungal community structure were observed between the lakes, correlated with salinity, total organic carbon, total nitrogen, and ammonium. Taxonomic profiling revealed depth-specific variations, with Saccharomycetes prevalent in Ursu Lake's deeper layers and Lecanoromycetes prevalent in the Fără Fund Lake. The functional annotation using FungalTraits revealed diverse ecological roles within the fungal communities. Lichenized fungi were dominant in Fără Fund Lake, while saprotrophs were abundant in Ursu Lake. Additionally, wood and soil saprotrophs, along with plant pathogens, were more prevalent in the surrounding soils, rivulet, and surface water layers. A global overview of the trophic relations in each studied niche was impossible to establish due to the unconnected graphs corresponding to the trophic interactions of the analyzed fungi. Plotting the unweighted connected subgraphs at the genus level suggests that salinity made the studied niches similar for the identified taxa. This study shed light on the understudied fungal diversity, distribution, and ecological functions in hypersaline environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.