ArticleJMIR mental health2024
An Ethical Perspective on the Democratization of Mental Health With Generative AI.
Article in JMIR mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- "It's Not Only Attention We Need": Systematic Review of Large Language Models in Mental Health Care.JMIR mental health · 2025Pooled it
- Large Language Models for Mental Health Applications: Systematic Review.JMIR mental health · 2024Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Topic-Based Chatbots on Mental Health Self-Care and Mental Well-Being: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Trial
- Liability and Standard of Care in AI-Driven Psychiatric Practice: European Viewpoint.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Engagement with a Chatbot-based Intervention for the delivery of mailed at-home COVID-19 Testing: a Descriptive Log Analysis Study from the SCALE-UP II Trial.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Use of a Conversational Agent for Training Mental Health Professionals in Suicide Safety Planning: Pilot Feasibility and Acceptability Study.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- Feasibility and acceptability of the MentiParent AI chatbot for training parental reflective functioning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The effectiveness of multilingual AI-based simulator for suicide risk assessment training in improving self-efficacy among young psychiatrists: a pilot study across twenty languages.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Non-death loss and GenAI: ethical reflections on griefbots of the living.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Generative AI as a de facto mental health provider: a policy brief and urgent call for regulation.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Personality, identity, and Artificial Intelligence: a grand challenge.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Acceptability of a Conversational Agent-Led Digital Program for Anxiety: Mixed Methods Study of User Perspectives.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- The Feasibility of Large Language Models in Verbal Comprehension Assessment: Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Responsible Design, Integration, and Use of Generative AI in Mental Health.JMIR mental health · 2025Article
- The externalization of internal experiences in psychotherapy through generative artificial intelligence: a theoretical, clinical, and ethical analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Research Progress and Clinical Implications of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Perinatal Health Care for Advanced Maternal Age Pregnant Women.International journal of women's health · 2025Review
- Validating GenAI feedback in suicide prevention training: a mixed-methods study of QPR skill assessment.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Transforming Perceptions: Exploring the Multifaceted Potential of Generative AI for People With Cognitive Disabilities.JMIR neurotechnology · 2025Article
- Empowering pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients with cancer utilizing generative AI chatbots to reduce psychological burden and enhance treatment engagement: a pilot study.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Generative artificial intelligence (AI): a key innovation or just hype in primary care settings?BMJ health & care informatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unlabelled: Knowledge has become more open and accessible to a large audience with the "democratization of information" facilitated by technology. This paper provides a sociohistorical perspective for the theme issue "Responsible Design, Integration, and Use of Generative AI in Mental Health." It evaluates ethical considerations in using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) for the democratization of mental health knowledge and practice. It explores the historical context of democratizing information, transitioning from restricted access to widespread availability due to the internet, open-source movements, and most recently, GenAI technologies such as large language models. The paper highlights why GenAI technologies represent a new phase in the democratization movement, offering unparalleled access to highly advanced technology as well as information. In the realm of mental health, this requires delicate and nuanced ethical deliberation. Including GenAI in mental health may allow, among other things, improved accessibility to mental health care, personalized responses, and conceptual flexibility, and could facilitate a flattening of traditional hierarchies between health care providers and patients. At the same time, it also entails significant risks and challenges that must be carefully addressed. To navigate these complexities, the paper proposes a strategic questionnaire for assessing artificial intelligence-based mental health applications. This tool evaluates both the benefits and the risks, emphasizing the need for a balanced and ethical approach to GenAI integration in mental health. The paper calls for a cautious yet positive approach to GenAI in mental health, advocating for the active engagement of mental health professionals in guiding GenAI development. It emphasizes the importance of ensuring that GenAI advancements are not only technologically sound but also ethically grounded and patient-centered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.