ArticleCadernos de saude publica2024
[Food consumption of the urban population in a municipality in the Legal Amazon, during climate events of flood and drought: a comparative study].
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Invariance of the Brazilian Food Insecurity Scale: analysis of demographic groups based on the Brazilian National Household Sample Survey].Cadernos de saude publica · 2026Article
- Healthy eating among people with type 2 diabetes in the Brazilian Amazon: a qualitative study in primary health care.Cadernos de saude publica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the food consumption of the population of Coari, Amazonas State, Brazil, according to the NOVA Classification, during the hydrological phases of drought and flooding of the Amazon rivers. An epidemiological, population-based, cross-sectional study was carried out. The sample consisted of 457 adult individuals. Data were collected in two stages using a sociodemographic instrument, a 24-hour food recall and a food frequency questionnaire adapted to local habits. The data were analyzed using the statistical program R version 4.2.4, using Pearson's chi-square, Fischer's exact and Bhapkar's tests. The sample was predominantly female (drought = 70%/flood = 71.2%) and brown (drought = 65.4%/flood = 66.2%). Most of the interviewees ate meals (breakfast, lunch and dinner). Afternoon snacks were the most common intermediate meal, especially during flooding (274/70.2%). In natura or minimally processed foods predominated at the three main meals (95%). Ultra-processed foods were consumed little or not at all and were mentioned especially during the drought (152/33.3%; p = 0.007). On the other hand, consumption of regional foods (tucumã, beiju, tapioca flour and açaí) increased during the flood (p < 0.001). Consumption of in natura or minimally processed foods continues to be the mainstay of the diet in the interior of Amazonas, with a predominance of regional foods during the flood and processed and ultra-processed foods during the drought, demonstrating the influence, albeit subtle, of the hydrological phases on the food consumption of this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.