Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39417271›Full record

ArticleHealthcare policy = Politiques de sante2024

Black Community Health Advocates in Ontario: A Look at Health Policy Engagement From the Ground Up.

Rhonda C George, Alpha Abebe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Recruiting for Engagement in Health Policy.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rhonda C GeorgeAssistant Professor, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON.
Alpha AbebeAssociate Professor, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study objectives: Disproportionately negative pandemic outcomes, lack of race-based data collection and poor engagement of Black communities in policy decision making have been widely documented for Black Canadians. We examine this to understand how formal public engagement processes might be more inclusive of Black peoples to inform more responsive policies. Methodology: The study employed an asset-based lens to examine how Black communities have engaged in health policy and advocacy in Ontario. In-depth interviews were conducted with eight participants who self-identify as Black, recruited using purposive and intensity sampling to (1) identify Results: Our findings suggest that while Black community advocates face systemic and contextual barriers, they also embody deep and multifaceted knowledge, training and experience, which inform the rich ways that they approach advocacy. Discussion: Despite its Ontario focus, this study adds breadth and depth to the existing literature on health policy and historically marginalized populations, offering broader lessons for policy makers across jurisdictions. Our findings encourage policy makers to better recognize, make space for and cultivate fertile advocacy foundations, cultural knowledge and community-driven systems already present in Black communities.

Indexed as

Health PolicyAdultBlack PeopleCommunity ParticipationConsumer AdvocacyFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedOntarioPolicy MakingQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID39417271
PMCPMC11523116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.