ArticleHealthcare policy = Politiques de sante2024
Trends in Government-Initiated Public Engagement in Canadian Health Policy From 2000 to 2021.
Article in Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sepsis policy, guidelines, and standards in Canada: a jurisdictional scoping review.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Article
- The role of patients, caregivers, and communities in Learning Health Systems: a narrative review.Frontiers in health services · 2025Review
- Black Community Health Advocates in Ontario: A Look at Health Policy Engagement From the Ground Up.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2024Article
- Public Engagement in Canadian Health Policy: Looking Back, Taking Stock and Charting the Future.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2024Article
- Recruiting for Engagement in Health Policy.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2024Article
- Public Deliberation for Ethically Complex Policies: The Case of Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Canada has a rich history of public engagement in health policy; however, shifts in engagement practices over time have not been critically examined. Methodology: We searched for cases of government-initiated public engagement in Canadian health policy from 2000 to 2021 at the federal, provincial (Ontario, British Columbia, Nova Scotia) and pan-Canadian levels. Government databases, portals and platforms for engagement were searched, followed by academic and grey literature using relevant search terms. A coding scheme was iteratively developed to categorize cases by target population, recruitment method and type of engagement. Results: We identified 132 cases of government-initiated public engagement. We found a predominance of feedback and consultation engagement types and self-selection recruitment, especially at the federal level from 2016 onward. Engagements that targeted multiple populations (patients, public and other stakeholders) were favoured overall and over time. Just over 10% of cases in our survey mentioned efforts to engage with equity-deserving groups. Conclusion: Overall, our results identify a heavy reliance over time on more passive, indirect engagement approaches, which limit opportunities for collaborative problem solving and fail to include equity-deserving populations. Those overseeing the design and implementation of government-initiated public engagement will draw valuable lessons from this review to inform the design of engagement initatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.