Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39417268›Full record

ArticleHealthcare policy = Politiques de sante2024

Trends in Government-Initiated Public Engagement in Canadian Health Policy From 2000 to 2021.

Roma Dhamanaskar, Katherine Boothe, Joanna Massie, Jeonghwa You, Danielle Just, Grace Kuang, Julia Abelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Recruiting for Engagement in Health Policy.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Roma DhamanaskarHealth Policy Program Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON.
Katherine BootheAssociate Professor, Department of Political Science, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON.
Joanna MassieDepartment of Political Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON.
Jeonghwa YouResearch Fellow, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON.
Danielle JustLead, Performance, Funding and Capacity, Ontario Health, Toronto, ON.
Grace KuangTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
Julia AbelsonProfessor, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Canada has a rich history of public engagement in health policy; however, shifts in engagement practices over time have not been critically examined. Methodology: We searched for cases of government-initiated public engagement in Canadian health policy from 2000 to 2021 at the federal, provincial (Ontario, British Columbia, Nova Scotia) and pan-Canadian levels. Government databases, portals and platforms for engagement were searched, followed by academic and grey literature using relevant search terms. A coding scheme was iteratively developed to categorize cases by target population, recruitment method and type of engagement. Results: We identified 132 cases of government-initiated public engagement. We found a predominance of feedback and consultation engagement types and self-selection recruitment, especially at the federal level from 2016 onward. Engagements that targeted multiple populations (patients, public and other stakeholders) were favoured overall and over time. Just over 10% of cases in our survey mentioned efforts to engage with equity-deserving groups. Conclusion: Overall, our results identify a heavy reliance over time on more passive, indirect engagement approaches, which limit opportunities for collaborative problem solving and fail to include equity-deserving populations. Those overseeing the design and implementation of government-initiated public engagement will draw valuable lessons from this review to inform the design of engagement initatives.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationHealth PolicyCanadaGovernmentHumans

Identifiers

PMID39417268
PMCPMC11523115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.