Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39417256›Full record

ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2025

A beautiful face is good when we're judged by others, a moral character is better.

Julia Baum, Rasha Abdel Rahman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julia BaumFaculty of Life Sciences, Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin 10099, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1212-5244
Rasha Abdel RahmanFaculty of Life Sciences, Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin 10099, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8438-1570

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft AB 277-6Humboldt-Research TrackStudienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes Professorin Ruebsamen-Schaeff Stipend
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Moral beauty, reflected in one's actions, and facial beauty both affect how we are judged. Here, we investigated how moral and facial beauty interact to affect social judgments and emotional responses, employing event-related brain potentials (ERPs). All participants (female) associated positive, neutral, or negative verbal information with faces scoring high or low on attractiveness and performed ratings of the faces as manipulation checks. In a separate test phase, the faces were presented again, and participants made valenced social judgments of the persons. Results show a dominance of moral beauty in valenced social judgments as well as ERPs related to reflexive and evaluative emotional responses (early posterior negativity and late positive potential), whereas facial attractiveness mattered little. In contrast, facial attractiveness affected visual processing (N170). Similarly, relatively shallow impressions of attractiveness and likability that require no knowledge about the person were influenced by both facial attractiveness and social-emotional information. This pattern of dominant effects of social-emotional information regardless of attractiveness shows that when it comes to our emotional responses and social judgments, moral beauty is what matters most, even in the face of physical beauty.

Indexed as

BeautyBrainFaceFacial RecognitionJudgmentMoralsSocial PerceptionAdolescentAdultElectroencephalographyEmotionsEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMalePhotic Stimulationattractivenessevent-related potentialsface processinghalo of beautysocial-emotional person knowledgesocial judgments

Identifiers

PMID39417256
PMCPMC12036660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.