Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39417172›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2024

Machine learning-based short-term DFS-associated characteristic factor screening and model construction for patients with gallbladder cancer after radical surgery.

Hanbin Dai, Yao Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hanbin DaiDepartment of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang, China.
Yao WangDepartment of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a malignancy with a bleak prognosis, and radical surgery remains the primary treatment option. However, the high postoperative recurrence rate and the lack of individualized risk assessment tools limit the effectiveness of current treatment strategies. This study aims to identify risk factors affecting the short-term disease-free survival (DFS) of GBC patients using machine learning methods and to build a prediction model. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data from 328 GBC patients treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University from 2008 to 2021. Patients were randomly divided into a training set (n=230) and a validation set (n=98). Clinical data, laboratory indexes, and follow-up data were collected. Univariate Cox regression analysis identified age, tumor T-staging, lymph node metastasis, differentiation degree, and CA199 level as prognostic factors affecting DFS (all P<0.05). A prediction model constructed using the LASSO regression achieved AUCs of 0.827 and 0.801 for predicting 1-year and 3-year DFS, respectively. Notably, the XGBoost regression model showed higher prediction accuracy with AUCs of 0.922 and 0.947, respectively. The Delong test confirmed that the XGBoost model had significantly higher AUC values compared to the LASSO model (all P<0.001). In the validation set, the XGBoost model demonstrated AUCs of 0.764 and 0.761 for predicting 1-year and 3-year DFS, respectively. Overall, the XGBoost regression model demonstrates high accuracy and clinical value in predicting short-term DFS in GBC patients after radical surgery, offering a valuable tool for personalized treatment.

Indexed as

disease-free survivalGallbladder carcinomaLASSO regressionmachine learningXGBoost regression

Identifiers

PMID39417172
PMCPMC11477827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.