ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Impaired speaking-induced suppression predicts degraded agency and hallucination severity in schizophrenia.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Agency is the awareness of being the originator of one's own thoughts and actions. Patients with schizophrenia (SZ) show deficits in agency that contribute to distortions in reality-monitoring (distinguishing self-generated from externally-produced information) and result in psychotic symptoms. Agency is also critical for speech-monitoring (monitoring what we hear ourselves say while speaking). For example, disruptions in agency that manifest as hallucinations are thought to result from the misattribution of the source of patients' inner thoughts/speech as external voices. Methods: We used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to assay assess agency during reality-monitoring (RM) and speech-monitoring (SM) tasks. In healthy controls (HC) during SM, the auditory cortical (A1) response is smaller while speaking (speak condition) compared to listening to the same speech (listen condition). This is known as speaking-induced suppression (SIS) M100 response which is measured using MEG 100ms after speech onset. Results: During RM, SZ (N=30) showed impairments in both self-agency (identification of self-generated information) and external-agency (identification of externally-produced information), compared to HC (N=30). During SM, SZ failed to enhance M100 A1 responses during the listen condition and suppress M100 A1 responses while speaking, revealing impaired SIS. Weakened SIS predicted worsening hallucination severity. Conclusions: SZ showed degraded neural M100 responses in A1 during the listen condition which drove impaired suppression of M100 SIS during highly-predictable self-generated speech. Impaired SIS induced noisier auditory sensory predictions, making it more likely for SZ to misattribute the source of inner thoughts/speech as externally-derived, giving rise to disruptions in agency during RM and more severe hallucinations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.