Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39417070›Full record

ReviewClinical kidney journal2024

Ethics in humanitarian settings-relevance and consequences for dialysis and kidney care.

Valerie A Luyckx, Wim Van Biesen, Jadranka Buturovic Ponikvar, Peter Heering, Ali Abu-Alfa, Ji Silberzweig, Monica Fontana, Serhan Tuglular, Mehmet Sukru Sever

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical kidney journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Valerie A LuyckxNephrology Department, University Children's Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7066-8135
Wim Van BiesenRenal Division, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4782-5224
Jadranka Buturovic PonikvarDepartment of Nephrology, Division of Internal Medicine, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Peter HeeringKfH-Nierenzentrum, Städtisches Klinikum Solingen, Solingen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.
Ali Abu-AlfaFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Nephrology, Beirut, Lebanon.
Ji SilberzweigThe Rogosin Institute, New York, USA.
Monica FontanaEuropean Renal Association European Dialysis and Transplant Association, Parma, Emilia-Romagna, Italy.
Serhan TuglularDepartment of Nephrology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mehmet Sukru SeverIstanbul University, Istanbul School of Medicine, Department of Nephrology, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing frequency and severity of disasters and the increasing number of patients living with kidney disease, on dialysis and with transplants around the world, the need for kidney care in humanitarian settings is increasing. Almost all humanitarian emergencies pose a threat to kidney health because all treatments are highly susceptible to interruption, and interruption can be deadly. Providing support for people requiring dialysis in humanitarian settings can be complex and is associated with many trade-offs. The global kidney care community must become familiar with the ethics, principles and duties essential to meeting the overarching goals of ethical and effective disaster relief. Ethics principles and values must be considered on the individual, public health and global levels. The wellbeing of a single patient must be considered in the context of the competing needs of many others, and optimal treatment may not be possible due to resource constraints. Public health ethics principles, including considerations of triage and resource allocation, maximization of benefit and feasibility, often become directly relevant at the bedside. Individuals delivering humanitarian relief must be well trained, competent, respectful and professional, while involved organizations need to uphold the highest professional and ethical standards. There may be dissonance between ethical guidance and practical realities in humanitarian settings, which for inexperienced individuals may present significant challenges. Sustaining dialysis care in emergencies brings these issues starkly to the fore. Preparedness for dialysis in emergencies is an ethical imperative that mandates multisectoral stakeholder engagement and action, development of surge response plans, clinical and ethics guidance, and transparent priority setting. This manuscript outlines common ethics challenges and considerations that apply in all humanitarian actions, and illustrates their relevance to kidney care as a whole, using examples of how these may apply to dialysis and kidney disaster relief efforts in humanitarian settings.

Indexed as

dialysisdisaster nephrologyethics principleshealth systems resiliencehumanitarian action

Identifiers

PMID39417070
PMCPMC11481472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.