ArticleClinical hematology international2024
Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation prior to HCT for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: To Boost or Not To Boost.
Article in Clinical hematology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acute lymphoblastic leukemia: an update on treatment and Brazilian perspective.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Total body irradiation (TBI) with or without cranial radiation boost (CRB) is an integral component of conditioning prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The benefit of CRB is not yet established. Methods: This is a retrospective single center cohort study. Between January of 2003 and April of 2019, electronic medical records of 166 patients with ALL were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred forty-three patients with ALL and no prior central nervous system (CNS) involvement were included. Patients were divided into two cohorts according to cranial radiation boost (cohort-1: CNS-/CRB+ (110/143, 77%) and cohort-2: CNS-/CRB- (n=33/143; 23%). No patients received post-transplant prophylactic intrathecal chemotherapy. Results: Following alloHCT, 15 patients (10.5%) experienced relapse; 11 relapses (10%) in cohort-1, and 4 (12%) in cohort-2. Four patients (26.6%) experienced systemic medullary relapse with initial central nervous system (CNS) involvement. One patient (6.6%) experienced isolated first central nervous system relapse after allotransplant with no difference between the two cohorts (6.6% vs 0; P-0.59). Age at transplant and phenotypic subtype were predictive of first central nervous system relapse after allotransplant with respective P-values of 0.001 and 0.015.At a median follow-up of 30 months (range: 2.5-128 months), the estimated 3-year overall survival was 61% (95% CI: 53-69), relapse free survival was 60% (95% CI: 52-69) and 3-year central nervous system-relapse-free survival was 99% and 100% in in cohort-1 and cohort-2 respectively, when systemic relapses were censored. There was no statistical significant difference in either survival or relapse free survival between the two cohorts (P > 0.69). Conclusions: Our results suggest that augmenting total body irradiation with cranial radiation boost in patients with ALL with no prior CNS involvement did not improve relapse risk in central nervous system or survival outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.