Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39417000›Full record

ArticleCampbell systematic reviews2024

Protocol: Assessing the impact of interest-holder engagement on guideline development: A systematic review.

Lyubov Lytvyn, Jennifer Petkovic, Joanne Khabsa, Olivia Magwood, Pauline Campbell, Ian D Graham, Kevin Pottie, Julia Bidonde, Heather Limburg, Danielle Pollock and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Campbell systematic reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lyubov LytvynDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.
Jennifer PetkovicBruyère Research Institute University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Joanne KhabsaAmerican University of Beirut Medical Center, Clinical Research Institute Beirut Lebanon.
Olivia MagwoodC.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Bruyere Research Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Pauline CampbellNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit Glasgow Caledonian University Glasgow UK.
Ian D GrahamSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Kevin PottieFamily Medicine Dalhousie University Halifax Nova Scotia Canada.
Julia BidondeNorwegian Institute of Public Health Oslo Norway.
Heather LimburgPublic Health Agency of Canada Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Danielle PollockUniversity of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia.
Elie A AklDepartment of Internal Medicine American University of Beirut Medical Center Beirut Lebanon.
Thomas W ConcannonThe RAND Corporation Boston Massachusetts USA.
Peter TugwellClinical Epidemiology Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. The objective of this review is to identify and synthesize empirical research on the impacts of interest-holder engagement on the guideline development process and content. Our research questions are as follows: (1) What are the empirical examples of impact on the process in health guideline development across any of the 18 steps of the GIN-McMaster checklist? (2) What are the empirical examples of impact on the content in health guideline development across any of the 18 steps of the GIN-McMaster checklist?

Indexed as

engagementguidelinesimpactpatient and public involvementstakeholder

Identifiers

PMID39417000
PMCPMC11480354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.