ArticleACS pharmacology & translational science2024
A Cellulose-Rich Diet Disrupts Gut Homeostasis and Leads to Anxiety through the Gut-Brain Axis.
Article in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural mechanisms linking Western diet consumption and cognitive impairment: a role for the vagus nerve.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2026Review
- The "pro-inflammatory imprint" of ultra-processed food exposure: a review of mechanisms affecting child and adolescent health and development via the gut microbiome-inflammation axis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- From gut inflammation to psychiatric comorbidity: mechanisms and therapies for anxiety and depression in inflammatory bowel disease.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2025Review
- Depression and anxiety in inflammatory bowel disease: mechanisms and emerging therapeutics targeting the microbiota-gut-brain axis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Advances in understanding dietary fiber: Classification, structural characterization, modification, and gut microbiome interactions.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is widely said that a healthy intestinal environment plays an essential role in better mental condition. One known dietary nutrient that maintains the intestinal environment is dietary fiber. A recent study showed that maintaining the intestinal environment with dietary fiber alleviated symptoms of psychiatric disorders in animals. However, such effects have only been reported with soluble fiber, which is highly fermentable and promotes short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production, and not with insoluble fiber. Therefore, we aimed to verify whether insoluble fiber, such as cellulose, can alter emotion via changes in the gut. We divided mice into two groups and fed either a standard diet (SD, which contains both insoluble and soluble dietary fibers) or a cellulose-rich diet (CRD, which contains cellulose alone as the dietary fibers). We found that CRD-fed mice display increased anxiety-like behavior. CRD-fed animals also showed decreased intestinal SCFA levels along with increased intestinal permeability, dysmotility, and hypersensitivity. This behavioral and physiological effect of CRD has been completely abolished in vagotomized mice, indicating the direct link between intestinal environment exacerbation to the emotion through the gut-brain axis. Additionally, we found that amygdalar dopamine signaling has been modified in CRD-fed animals, and the opioid antagonist abolished this dopaminergic modification as well as CRD-induced anxiety. Altogether, our findings indicate that consumption of cellulose alone as the dietary fiber may evoke intestinal abnormalities, which fire the vagus nerve, then the opioidergic system, and amygdalar dopamine upregulation, resulting in the enhancement of anxiety.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.