Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39416946›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Exploring organizational aspects that promote health-related preventive behavior: using the example of work-related SARS-CoV-2 infection control measures in Germany, August 2020 to November 2021.

Jana Soeder, Anke Wagner, Anna T Neunhöffer, Peter Martus, Falko Papenfuss, Andrea Wittich, Juliane Schwille-Kiuntke, Esther Rind, Monika A Rieger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jana SoederInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Anke WagnerInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Anna T NeunhöfferInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Peter MartusInstitute for Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biometry, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Falko PapenfussMedical Services, Robert Bosch GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany.
Andrea WittichOccupational Psychologist and Psychotherapist, Tübingen, Germany.
Juliane Schwille-KiuntkeInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Esther RindInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Monika A RiegerInstitute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: During the communicable coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, organizational infection control measures (oICMs) were introduced in the workplace. The employees' positive attitudes and active participation are relevant for full effectiveness regarding disease prevention. Therefore, we explore changes in employees' attitudes toward oICM at work from August-October 2020 (T0) over January 2021 (T1) to October-November 2021 (T2). We further investigate the role an organization can play in supporting health-related preventive behavior. Methods: We considered repeated cross-sectional and longitudinal panel survey data from 5,554 employees of a global supplier of technology and services in Germany. A total of 16 items constitute the attitude scores toward oICM (5-point Likert scale). Via mixed-effect model, aspects associated with employees' attitudes toward oICM were explored. Via 'extreme-group' approach, we compared the 20% of participants with the largest changes into less favorable to the 20% with the largest changes into more favorable attitudes toward oICM over time. Results: The overall positive attitudes toward work-related oICM were more favorable at T1 (mean ± SD: 4.2 ± 0.6, median (IQR): 4.3 (0.8), Conclusion: oICMs in the workplace were perceived appropriate even after COVID-19 vaccines were widely available although the perceived affective risks about SARS-CoV-2 decreased. Taken together, our findings highlight how organizations can support employees in adopting health-related preventive behavior. Among others, we found that feeling well-informed about possible work-related health risks was positively associated with long-term favorable attitudes toward work-related oICM. We expect that the results contribute to the development of interventions to prepare and adapt to future global public health concerns.

Indexed as

COVID-19Infection ControlSARS-CoV-2WorkplaceAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHealth BehaviorHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesattitudeCOVID-19health promotionoccupational safety and healthsafety cultureSARS-CoV-2working conditionworkplace

Identifiers

PMID39416946
PMCPMC11480029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.