ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
A ten-year overview of cancer genetic family history screening in Georgia's Latina population.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Community-Based Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Family History Assessment and Genetic Testing among Spanish-Speaking Hispanic/Latina Women in California.Cancer research communications · 2026Article
- Barriers and facilitators of cancer genetic risk screening at community-based organizations serving Latinas.Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Population-based cancer genetic family history (FH) screening to identify families at high risk for BRCA-associated cancers has been endorsed by national public health policies. This report aimed to describe the utilization of FH screening services from 2013 to 2022 according to rurality and socioeconomic deprivation among Latinas in Georgia. Methods: Women who attended a medical appointment at participating Georgia Public Health Clinics were invited to complete FH screening. Screening results and participant zip code were reviewed. Area deprivation index (ADI) was measured at the census block group level and dichotomized (more deprived and less deprived). Rurality was measured through Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes and dichotomized (urban and rural). The ADI and RUCA codes were linked to participant data by zip code to characterize FH utilization among the Latina community. Results: Of the 9,330 adult Latinas in Georgia that completed cancer genetic FH screening, 9,066 (97.17%) women screened negative, and 264 (2.83%) screened positive (i.e., FH suggestive of higher risk for carrying BRCA1/2 mutations compared to the general population). Screening completion was higher among Latinas in urban areas ( Conclusion: Georgia's FH screening program reached Latinas across Georgia, particularly those living in urban, socially deprived areas. To ensure equitable cancer genetic screening dissemination, future efforts should prioritize tailored outreach in rural regions and comprehensive evaluations to identify key determinants of screening trends among Georgia's Latina population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.