Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39416919›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2023

Decoding dye degradation: Microbial remediation of textile industry effluents.

Soumyajit Das, Lubhan Cherwoo, Ravinder Singh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advances in Physicochemical and Biological Treatment of Textile Wastewater: An Applied Review of Methods, Technologies, and Costs.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Microbial degradation of textile dye reactive blue 250 (RB 250) by the novel Pseudomonas aeruginosa RGB11: a sustainable approach.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Soumyajit DasDepartment of Biotechnology, Chandigarh University, Punjab, India.
Lubhan CherwooCSIR- Central Scientific Instruments Organisation, Chandigarh, India.
Ravinder SinghDepartment of Biotechnology, Chandigarh University, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extensive use of chemical dyes, primarily Azo and anthraquinone dyes, in textiles has resulted in their alarming release into the environment by textile industries. The introduction of heavy metals into these dyes leads to an increase in Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), and water toxicity. Conventional physicochemical methods for treating textile effluents are costly and energy-intensive. Here introduction of new strategies is eminent, microbial bioremediation for the biodegradation and detoxification of these hazardous dyes, possesses as an innovative solution for the existing problem, discussed are specific groups of bacteria, fungi, and algae which could be one of the potential decolorizing agents that could replace the majority of other expensive processes in textile wastewater treatment by using enzymes like peroxidase, laccase, and azoreductase. These enzymes catalyzes chemical reactions that break down the dye molecules into less harmful substances. Additionally, novel strategies and advancements to enhance the effectiveness of these microbes and their products are comprehensively discussed.

Indexed as

Azo dyesBioremediationEnzymatic activityMicrobial degradationPhytoremediation

Identifiers

PMID39416919
PMCPMC11446375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.