ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Developing an interprofessional identity complementary to a professional identity - findings related to Extended Professional Identity Theory (EPIT).
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building interprofessional identity in neurology with interactive interprofessional learning: a randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Cross-cultural and international barriers and enablers to medication safety and pharmacotherapy: insights from a World Café study on interprofessional education.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- When I Say … Interprofessional identity.Medical education · 2026Article
- Co-designing an interprofessional care pathway for (risk of) malnutrition and sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Supporting Students' Interprofessional Identity Formation Through Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction: A Qualitative Inquiry.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Medical students' perception of the role of nursing in medical care: implications for interprofessional education.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Understanding Undergraduate Medicines Optimisation Education and Its Importance; a Realist Evaluation.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Article
- Shaping interprofessional identity and attitudes: scenario-based training in oral-systemic patient management.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Navigating Professional Identity and Cultural Expectations: A Phenomenological Study of Female Saudi Nurses' Experiences in Mixed-Gender Healthcare Settings.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of "The Interprofessional Education Academy".BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Article
- Professional and Interprofessional Identity Formation in Healthcare Students During Placement in an Interprofessional Training Unit - A Multicentre Quantitative Study.Perspectives on medical education · 2025Article
- Promoting Speaking Up Through Interprofessional Identity Triggers in a Mixed-Profession Simulation Scenario: Two Group Double-Blinded Pre-Test-Only Design.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Collaboration among various professions often faces barriers owing to divergent perspectives, priorities, and expertise shaped by distinct socialization processes. These differences can hinder effectiveness, efficiency, and workforce well-being. The Extended Professional Identity Theory (EPIT) addresses this issue by fostering an interprofessional identity without weakening professional identities. Drawing from psychological theories, EPIT explains the coexistence of interprofessional and professional identities, and predicts associated behaviors. It also emphasizes the importance of combining interprofessional identity formation with developing interprofessional competencies and adapting to environmental factors to achieve synergy in (temporary or permanent) mixed profession groups. Introduced in 2018, EPIT research initially relied on the measurement of congruent interprofessional behaviors as indirect indicators of interprofessional identity that could not yet be measured. An experiment demonstrated that enhancing social identification in mixed profession groups with interprofessional assignments reduced the social hierarchy within 6 h across three meetings. The 2020 development of the Extended Professional Identity Scale (EPIS) confirmed interprofessional identity as a three-dimensional social construct. So far, several scientific studies have supported many propositions of EPIT. These propositions are related to dimensionality and various psychometric properties, cross-cultural similarities, evidence and clues for interprofessional identity formation, and its predictive validity in interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Türkiye is among several countries (e.g., the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Lithuania, Finland, and Indonesia) where EPIT-based interprofessional identity is being investigated. To illustrate contextual differences and their potential cross-cultural implications, it is valuable to explore how interprofessional identity adds value in the Turkish context. This approach facilitates understanding the regional implications of interprofessional identity, including interprofessional education initiatives, increased university engagement, the development of measurement instruments, challenges and future directions, and national and international collaborations. This paper aims to explain and clarify EPIT propositions compared to other theories, describe current evidence, and outline future research directions, with a focus on developments within the Turkish context as a showcase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.