ArticleDigital health
Hierarchical deep learning for autonomous multi-label arrhythmia detection and classification on real-world wearable electrocardiogram data.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of Machine Learning Approach to Classify Human Activity Level Based on Lifelog Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Arrhythmia detection and classification are challenging because of the imbalanced ratio of normal heartbeats to arrhythmia heartbeats and the complicated combinations of arrhythmia types. Arrhythmia classification on wearable electrocardiogram monitoring devices poses a further unique challenge: unlike clinically used electrocardiogram monitoring devices, the environments in which wearable devices are deployed are drastically different from the carefully controlled clinical environment, leading to significantly more noise, thus making arrhythmia classification more difficult. Methods: We propose a novel hierarchical model based on CNN+BiLSTM with Attention to arrhythmia detection, consisting of a binary classification module between normal and arrhythmia heartbeats and a multi-label classification module for classifying arrhythmia events across combinations of beat and rhythm arrhythmia types. We evaluate our method on our proprietary dataset and compare it with various baselines, including CNN+BiGRU with Attention, ConViT, EfficientNet, and ResNet, as well as previous state-of-the-art frameworks. Results: Our model outperforms existing baselines on the proprietary dataset, resulting in an average accuracy, Conclusions: Our results validate the ability of our model to detect and classify real-world arrhythmia. Our framework could revolutionize arrhythmia diagnosis by reducing the burden on cardiologists, providing more personalized treatment, and achieving emergency intervention of patients by allowing real-time monitoring of arrhythmia occurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.