Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39416836›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Monitoring virtual interactions of teachers and students in social networks.

Ulzharkyn Abdigapbarova, Sholpan Arzymbetova, Meruyert Imankulova, Nadezhda Zhiyenbayeva, Olga Tapalova

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ulzharkyn AbdigapbarovaDepartment of Pedagogy and Psychology, Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Sholpan ArzymbetovaDepartment of Science and Innovation, University named after Zh. A. Tashenev, Shymkent, Kazakhstan.
Meruyert ImankulovaDepartment of Science, Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Nadezhda ZhiyenbayevaDepartment of Special Education, Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Olga TapalovaDepartment of General and Applied Psychology, Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the era of digitalization, the study of interaction between teachers and students in social networks gains particular relevance. The aim of this research is to monitor these virtual interactions for a deep analysis of opinions, beliefs, preferences, and behavioral patterns regarding the culture of online communication and digital etiquette in online communities. The participants included 227 students (M = 21.59; SD = 2.03) and 114 teachers (M = 40.17; SD = 8.83) from three higher education institutions in Kazakhstan. Specially developed scales of digital etiquette level and online communication quality were used for analysis, and a SWOT analysis (identifying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) was conducted based on respondent interviews. The results indicated that there was no significant difference in the level of digital etiquette between students and teachers; however, a substantial difference was found in the quality of online communication, with students exhibiting better performance. The correlational analysis did not reveal a statistically significant relationship between the level of digital etiquette and the quality of online communication. The study identifies important aspects of the relationship between digital etiquette and the quality of online communication, providing valuable data for practitioners in the current field and emphasizing the need for further research.

Indexed as

Behavior analysisdigital literacyEmotional impactInternet interactionOnline communicationReputation managementSocial media

Identifiers

PMID39416836
PMCPMC11481629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.